With a slim majority in the Senate, Democrats have an opportunity to make President Joe Biden’s policy goals a reality, but they still need to garner at least some bipartisan support to get most bills through the Senate...
With a slim majority in the Senate, Democrats have an opportunity to make President Joe Biden’s policy goals a reality, but they still need to garner at least some bipartisan support to get most bills through the Senate. To boost their likelihood of success, Senate Democrats may look to weaken one of the Republican’s last weapons, by reforming the filibuster or even eliminating it with regards to legislation.
History of the Filibuster
The right of unlimited debate, although controversial, has long been a hallmark of the U.S. Senate. While it can be prone to abuse, it also helps ensure that political minorities retain their voice.
The tactic of using long speeches to delay or derail action on legislation dates back to the earliest days of the Senate. The practice gradually became known as “filibustering” and now encompasses any use of dilatory or obstructive tactics to block a measure by preventing it from coming to a vote. The record for the longest filibuster goes to U.S. Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who held the Senate floor for 24 hours and 18 minutes, speaking out against the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
The first Senate rule designed to close debate and force a vote was enacted in 1917, at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson. It allowed the Senate to invoke cloture and limit debate with a two-thirds majority vote. The current cloture rule dates back to 1975. Under Senate Rule XXII, 16 Senators must initiate the cloture process by presenting a motion to end the debate. In most circumstances, the Senate does not vote on this cloture motion until the second day of the session after the motion is made. Then, it requires a vote of 60 senators to close debate. A two-thirds vote is needed to close debate on proposed amendments to the Senate Rules.
While once relatively rare, filibusters are now routine in the Senate. In 2009, there were a record sixty-seven filibusters in the first half of the 111th Congress — double the number of filibusters that occurred in the entire twenty-year period between 1950 and 1969. As highlighted by the Congressional Research Service, the prospect of a filibuster significantly impacts how the Senate conducts its business. When threatened with a filibuster, the majority leader may decide not to call legislation up for floor consideration or delay doing so in favor of pursuing more favorable bills. Additionally, a threatened filibuster can motivate a bill’s sponsors to agree to amendments that they oppose in order to avoid a filibuster.
Likelihood of Filibuster Reform
In recent years, both parties have reformed the filibuster rule to advance their interests. When Republicans blocked President Barack Obama’s executive and judicial branch nominees, Democrats changed the rules to establish a simple 51-vote threshold to confirm those roles. Under President Donald Trump, Republicans eliminated the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
Even with a Democratic majority in the Senate, eliminating the filibuster in the current Senate may be an uphill battle. Democrats would need all 50 Senators on board, and at least two moderates have voiced support for maintaining the filibuster. Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell has also warned of a “scorched earth” reaction if Democrats abolish the filibuster. “Everything that Democrat Senates did to Presidents Bush and Trump, everything the Republican Senate did to President Obama would be child’s play compared to the disaster that Democrats would create for their own priorities if they break the Senate,” he stated.
Filibuster reforms may, however, be a possibility. President Joe Biden has backed the idea of reinstating the “talking filibuster,” which requires the senator holding up a bill to remain physically present and speak on the Senate floor. “I don’t think that you have to eliminate the filibuster – you have to do it what it used to be when I first got to the Senate back in the old days. You had to stand up and command the floor, you had to keep talking,” Biden stated in a recent ABC News interview. He recently stated that he may also be open to more substantive reforms.
Key Takeaway
The filibuster rules were established to keep legislation moving through the Senate. Whether reforming or removing them in the current political climate would improve the legislative process is certainly up for debate. We will continue to monitor developments in this area and provide updates as they become available.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Is Filibuster Reform Really on the Horizon?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
With a slim majority in the Senate, Democrats have an opportunity to make President Joe Biden’s policy goals a reality, but they still need to garner at least some bipartisan support to get most bills through the Senate...
With a slim majority in the Senate, Democrats have an opportunity to make President Joe Biden’s policy goals a reality, but they still need to garner at least some bipartisan support to get most bills through the Senate. To boost their likelihood of success, Senate Democrats may look to weaken one of the Republican’s last weapons, by reforming the filibuster or even eliminating it with regards to legislation.
History of the Filibuster
The right of unlimited debate, although controversial, has long been a hallmark of the U.S. Senate. While it can be prone to abuse, it also helps ensure that political minorities retain their voice.
The tactic of using long speeches to delay or derail action on legislation dates back to the earliest days of the Senate. The practice gradually became known as “filibustering” and now encompasses any use of dilatory or obstructive tactics to block a measure by preventing it from coming to a vote. The record for the longest filibuster goes to U.S. Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who held the Senate floor for 24 hours and 18 minutes, speaking out against the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
The first Senate rule designed to close debate and force a vote was enacted in 1917, at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson. It allowed the Senate to invoke cloture and limit debate with a two-thirds majority vote. The current cloture rule dates back to 1975. Under Senate Rule XXII, 16 Senators must initiate the cloture process by presenting a motion to end the debate. In most circumstances, the Senate does not vote on this cloture motion until the second day of the session after the motion is made. Then, it requires a vote of 60 senators to close debate. A two-thirds vote is needed to close debate on proposed amendments to the Senate Rules.
While once relatively rare, filibusters are now routine in the Senate. In 2009, there were a record sixty-seven filibusters in the first half of the 111th Congress — double the number of filibusters that occurred in the entire twenty-year period between 1950 and 1969. As highlighted by the Congressional Research Service, the prospect of a filibuster significantly impacts how the Senate conducts its business. When threatened with a filibuster, the majority leader may decide not to call legislation up for floor consideration or delay doing so in favor of pursuing more favorable bills. Additionally, a threatened filibuster can motivate a bill’s sponsors to agree to amendments that they oppose in order to avoid a filibuster.
Likelihood of Filibuster Reform
In recent years, both parties have reformed the filibuster rule to advance their interests. When Republicans blocked President Barack Obama’s executive and judicial branch nominees, Democrats changed the rules to establish a simple 51-vote threshold to confirm those roles. Under President Donald Trump, Republicans eliminated the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
Even with a Democratic majority in the Senate, eliminating the filibuster in the current Senate may be an uphill battle. Democrats would need all 50 Senators on board, and at least two moderates have voiced support for maintaining the filibuster. Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell has also warned of a “scorched earth” reaction if Democrats abolish the filibuster. “Everything that Democrat Senates did to Presidents Bush and Trump, everything the Republican Senate did to President Obama would be child’s play compared to the disaster that Democrats would create for their own priorities if they break the Senate,” he stated.
Filibuster reforms may, however, be a possibility. President Joe Biden has backed the idea of reinstating the “talking filibuster,” which requires the senator holding up a bill to remain physically present and speak on the Senate floor. “I don’t think that you have to eliminate the filibuster – you have to do it what it used to be when I first got to the Senate back in the old days. You had to stand up and command the floor, you had to keep talking,” Biden stated in a recent ABC News interview. He recently stated that he may also be open to more substantive reforms.
Key Takeaway
The filibuster rules were established to keep legislation moving through the Senate. Whether reforming or removing them in the current political climate would improve the legislative process is certainly up for debate. We will continue to monitor developments in this area and provide updates as they become available.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
