Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Victory in Tax Shelter Case May Cost BNY Mellon $800 Million
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 27, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Internal Revenue Service won a major victory in a high-profile tax shelter case that may carry costly implications for multinational corporations.
A federal U.S. Tax Court handed down a ruling that bars Bank of New York Mellon from claiming millions of dollars in foreign tax credits arranged by Barclays. The case involves complex tax shelters, known as Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities, which essentially generate artificial tax credits for companies. The IRS has argued against six banks that have participated in this practice, namely because the complexity of these arrangements can leave a great deal of room for potential tax law violations.
The tax court agreed with the IRS and noted that the transaction was the result of “pre-arranged steps designed as a subterfuge for generating, monetizing and transferring the value of foreign tax credits among the STARS participants,” according to the Financial Times.
“The Stars transaction was a complicated scheme centered around arbitraging domestic and foreign tax law inconsistencies,” the court added.
BNY Mellon said it plans to appeal the ruling, but will accept after-tax charges amounting to roughly $850 million as a result of the court decision.
“We will appeal the court’s decision,” a spokesman said, according to the Washington Post. “We continue to believe the tax treatment of the transaction was consistent with statutory and judicial authority existing at the time.”
The court ruling may carry long-term tax implications for other banks that have drawn the ire of the IRS for this practice. The U.S. banks in question that entered into Stars transactions with Barclays participated in these deals between 1999 and 2006. As the IRS seeks to close the $385 billion tax gap, the deals of the other banks the IRS is examining amounts to roughly $2 billion.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.