Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Victory in Tax Shelter Case May Cost BNY Mellon $800 Million
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 27, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Internal Revenue Service won a major victory in a high-profile tax shelter case that may carry costly implications for multinational corporations.
A federal U.S. Tax Court handed down a ruling that bars Bank of New York Mellon from claiming millions of dollars in foreign tax credits arranged by Barclays. The case involves complex tax shelters, known as Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities, which essentially generate artificial tax credits for companies. The IRS has argued against six banks that have participated in this practice, namely because the complexity of these arrangements can leave a great deal of room for potential tax law violations.
The tax court agreed with the IRS and noted that the transaction was the result of “pre-arranged steps designed as a subterfuge for generating, monetizing and transferring the value of foreign tax credits among the STARS participants,” according to the Financial Times.
“The Stars transaction was a complicated scheme centered around arbitraging domestic and foreign tax law inconsistencies,” the court added.
BNY Mellon said it plans to appeal the ruling, but will accept after-tax charges amounting to roughly $850 million as a result of the court decision.
“We will appeal the court’s decision,” a spokesman said, according to the Washington Post. “We continue to believe the tax treatment of the transaction was consistent with statutory and judicial authority existing at the time.”
The court ruling may carry long-term tax implications for other banks that have drawn the ire of the IRS for this practice. The U.S. banks in question that entered into Stars transactions with Barclays participated in these deals between 1999 and 2006. As the IRS seeks to close the $385 billion tax gap, the deals of the other banks the IRS is examining amounts to roughly $2 billion.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know
For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law
As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions
In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What?
Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: George McGowan
Why Every Business Should Conduct an Annual Insurance Coverage Review
Most New Jersey business owners purchase insurance policies, file them away, and assume they are protected if a claim arises. Without a regular insurance coverage review, many companies discover gaps only after a lawsuit, cyberattack, property loss, or other significant event occurs. An annual insurance coverage review can help businesses identify potential risks, ensure their […]
Author: George McGowan
Demand Letters & Cease and Desist Letters: When to Send One (and When Not To)
Businesses and individuals often encounter situations where another party breaches a contract, fails to pay a debt, or continues harmful conduct. In many such disputes, a precisely drafted demand letter or cease-and-desist letter serves as a powerful legal tool. It can frequently resolve the dispute and avoid litigation. While demand or cease-and-desist letters can resolve […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.