Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Victory in Tax Shelter Case May Cost BNY Mellon $800 Million
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 27, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Internal Revenue Service won a major victory in a high-profile tax shelter case that may carry costly implications for multinational corporations.
A federal U.S. Tax Court handed down a ruling that bars Bank of New York Mellon from claiming millions of dollars in foreign tax credits arranged by Barclays. The case involves complex tax shelters, known as Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities, which essentially generate artificial tax credits for companies. The IRS has argued against six banks that have participated in this practice, namely because the complexity of these arrangements can leave a great deal of room for potential tax law violations.
The tax court agreed with the IRS and noted that the transaction was the result of “pre-arranged steps designed as a subterfuge for generating, monetizing and transferring the value of foreign tax credits among the STARS participants,” according to the Financial Times.
“The Stars transaction was a complicated scheme centered around arbitraging domestic and foreign tax law inconsistencies,” the court added.
BNY Mellon said it plans to appeal the ruling, but will accept after-tax charges amounting to roughly $850 million as a result of the court decision.
“We will appeal the court’s decision,” a spokesman said, according to the Washington Post. “We continue to believe the tax treatment of the transaction was consistent with statutory and judicial authority existing at the time.”
The court ruling may carry long-term tax implications for other banks that have drawn the ire of the IRS for this practice. The U.S. banks in question that entered into Stars transactions with Barclays participated in these deals between 1999 and 2006. As the IRS seeks to close the $385 billion tax gap, the deals of the other banks the IRS is examining amounts to roughly $2 billion.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
IRS Victory in Tax Shelter Case May Cost BNY Mellon $800 Million
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Internal Revenue Service won a major victory in a high-profile tax shelter case that may carry costly implications for multinational corporations.
A federal U.S. Tax Court handed down a ruling that bars Bank of New York Mellon from claiming millions of dollars in foreign tax credits arranged by Barclays. The case involves complex tax shelters, known as Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities, which essentially generate artificial tax credits for companies. The IRS has argued against six banks that have participated in this practice, namely because the complexity of these arrangements can leave a great deal of room for potential tax law violations.
The tax court agreed with the IRS and noted that the transaction was the result of “pre-arranged steps designed as a subterfuge for generating, monetizing and transferring the value of foreign tax credits among the STARS participants,” according to the Financial Times.
“The Stars transaction was a complicated scheme centered around arbitraging domestic and foreign tax law inconsistencies,” the court added.
BNY Mellon said it plans to appeal the ruling, but will accept after-tax charges amounting to roughly $850 million as a result of the court decision.
“We will appeal the court’s decision,” a spokesman said, according to the Washington Post. “We continue to believe the tax treatment of the transaction was consistent with statutory and judicial authority existing at the time.”
The court ruling may carry long-term tax implications for other banks that have drawn the ire of the IRS for this practice. The U.S. banks in question that entered into Stars transactions with Barclays participated in these deals between 1999 and 2006. As the IRS seeks to close the $385 billion tax gap, the deals of the other banks the IRS is examining amounts to roughly $2 billion.