Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Victory in Tax Shelter Case May Cost BNY Mellon $800 Million
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 27, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Internal Revenue Service won a major victory in a high-profile tax shelter case that may carry costly implications for multinational corporations.
A federal U.S. Tax Court handed down a ruling that bars Bank of New York Mellon from claiming millions of dollars in foreign tax credits arranged by Barclays. The case involves complex tax shelters, known as Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities, which essentially generate artificial tax credits for companies. The IRS has argued against six banks that have participated in this practice, namely because the complexity of these arrangements can leave a great deal of room for potential tax law violations.
The tax court agreed with the IRS and noted that the transaction was the result of “pre-arranged steps designed as a subterfuge for generating, monetizing and transferring the value of foreign tax credits among the STARS participants,” according to the Financial Times.
“The Stars transaction was a complicated scheme centered around arbitraging domestic and foreign tax law inconsistencies,” the court added.
BNY Mellon said it plans to appeal the ruling, but will accept after-tax charges amounting to roughly $850 million as a result of the court decision.
“We will appeal the court’s decision,” a spokesman said, according to the Washington Post. “We continue to believe the tax treatment of the transaction was consistent with statutory and judicial authority existing at the time.”
The court ruling may carry long-term tax implications for other banks that have drawn the ire of the IRS for this practice. The U.S. banks in question that entered into Stars transactions with Barclays participated in these deals between 1999 and 2006. As the IRS seeks to close the $385 billion tax gap, the deals of the other banks the IRS is examining amounts to roughly $2 billion.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.