
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: February 1, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe IRS is within its rights to request financial records from UBS of U.S. taxpayers suspected of hiding their income in accounts with Swiss bank Wegelin, a court ruled.
U.S. District Judge William Pauley granted the Internal Revenue Service a motion to issue a “John Doe” summons – which requests information about possible tax fraud committed by individuals whose identities are not known – on UBS. Following the guilty plea and subsequent closure of Switzerland’s oldest bank Wegelin, which admitted to helping U.S. clients skirt their U.S. tax law obligations, Pauley said that the IRS request was valid, as many UBS taxpayers may have hidden their income at Wegelin and other Swiss banks.
Following the ruling, a UBS spokesperson that the bank would comply with the request, and offer up information on U.S. clients. However, it noted that it would only provide U.S. records, not Swiss ones, to the federal tax agency, according to Reuters.
Although UBS was previously absolved of its own tax law violations in 2009 after it admitted to helping Americans evade taxes and agreed to a $780 million settlement, its association with Wegelin has put it back in the spotlight. Wegelin pleaded guilty on January 3 to helping U.S. clients hide income in secret accounts, and became the first foreign bank to be indicted by the U.S. A spokesman for the bank also raised eyebrows and make other banks nervous when he admitted that facilitating tax evasion was a common practice among many financial institutions. The 271-year-old institution agreed to pay $57.8 million in fines.
Wegelin is just the latest bank on the list of Swiss institutions the IRS is examining in connection with tax evasion as it seeks to crackdown on the misuse of offshore accounts and close the federal tax gap.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!