Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 20, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently ruled the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to license independent tax preparers. However, the IRS said it plans to appeal the decision, a move that may affect as many as many as 700,000 professionals who file their clients’ tax returns.
At the center of the issue is the federal tax agency’s latest tax licensing effort, which would have required independent preparers not affiliated with large corporate entities, such as H&R Block, to pass a competency test and follow several new regulations and rules. These changes would have taken place under the IRS’s newly created Registered Tax Return Preparers Program.
The IRS noted that too many mistakes were being made by independent agents which were causing delays and higher expenses. The federal court quickly struck down the IRS’ rules, which would have imposed a new annual application fee and continuing educational requirements on independent preparers. The RTRP program requirements would have started on January 1, 2014, and attorneys, certified public accountants and enrolled agents would be exempt from the policies.
Judge James Boasberg’s ruling also included an injunction that prohibited the implementation of the RTRP program.
The IRS said it will appeal the decision, noting that discontinuing the program “would result in a substantial disruption to tax administration,” according to Bloomberg. The agency also noted that hundreds of thousands of independent preparers are responsible for more than 80 million returns each year, and failing to set standards can open the door to costly errors and inadvertent tax law violations. The IRS has taken several measures to both elucidate on the tax code and reduce tax evasion, both of which are designed to help close the $385 billion tax gap.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!