Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS to Appeal Court's Tax Licensing Decision
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 20, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Court Makes Decision on Tax Licensing Case
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently ruled the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to license independent tax preparers. However, the IRS said it plans to appeal the decision, a move that may affect as many as many as 700,000 professionals who file their clients’ tax returns.
At the center of the issue is the federal tax agency’s latest tax licensing effort, which would have required independent preparers not affiliated with large corporate entities, such as H&R Block, to pass a competency test and follow several new regulations and rules. These changes would have taken place under the IRS’s newly created Registered Tax Return Preparers Program.
The IRS noted that too many mistakes were being made by independent agents which were causing delays and higher expenses. The federal court quickly struck down the IRS’ rules, which would have imposed a new annual application fee and continuing educational requirements on independent preparers. The RTRP program requirements would have started on January 1, 2014, and attorneys, certified public accountants and enrolled agents would be exempt from the policies.
Judge James Boasberg’s ruling also included an injunction that prohibited the implementation of the RTRP program.
The IRS said it will appeal the decision, noting that discontinuing the program “would result in a substantial disruption to tax administration,” according to Bloomberg. The agency also noted that hundreds of thousands of independent preparers are responsible for more than 80 million returns each year, and failing to set standards can open the door to costly errors and inadvertent tax law violations. The IRS has taken several measures to both elucidate on the tax code and reduce tax evasion, both of which are designed to help close the $385 billion tax gap.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.