
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 4, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comCorporate inversions, in which a U.S.-based multinational acquires a smaller, foreign firm in order to re-domicile in a new, lower-tax country, have become a serious issue in American politics recently. Now, it appears that this issue may be a powerful motivator in the upcoming midterm House and Senate elections this November, according to The Wall Street Journal
A renewed push coming from the White House brought the issue even further into the public spotlight, alongside a coordinated drive from the Democratic party to effect legislation that will limit or halt the practice, the news source explained. Many Republicans agree that the issue should be addressed, but are halting bills that would curb the practice, hoping instead for a complete overhaul of the corporate income tax. These right-wing politicians note that the U.S. has the highest on-paper corporate income tax rate in the developed world. They say that they haven’t seen any proposals from the White House that would solve the problem.
Democrats have made a number of proposals that would alter the corporate tax code, including one that would change the requirement regarding the acquired company’s ownership share of the joint company that is created in an inversion, according to the Journal. Currently, the requirement is that the foreign company’s shareholders must be given at least a 20 percent share in the new company, meaning that it is frequently in the best interests of shareholders in the U.S. company to give up a portion of their shares in exchange for a significantly lower tax burden. A proposal from Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, would raise this requirement to 50 percent.
“This is an issue that understandably gets people very angry,” Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, told the news source. “If Republicans are going to oppose our efforts in this area, they are going to have to explain why they are shielding American corporations that are deserting the U.S. in order to dodge their obligations to the country and American taxpayers.”
It seems that 2014 is the year of corporate tax inversions. Frank Brunetti and I have written about this topic at tremendous length due to all the new information brought to light about this subject. Find out more about the companies involved in corporate tax inversion and what Washington is doing about it here:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!