Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 1, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC) recently released its International IP Index. The annual report evaluates the intellectual property (IP) environments of 50 world economies and ranks them based on 40 different indicators. The indicators are divided into eight categories of IP protection: patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, commercialization of IP assets, enforcement, systemic efficiency, and membership and ratification of international treaties.
As in the past, the International IP Index highlights that investment in IP protection leads to tangible economic growth. In fact, IP-driven economies are 55 percent more likely to adopt sophisticated, state-of-the-art technology, and are 26 percent more competitive overall. In addition, these economies are twice as likely to produce and export complex, knowledge-intensive products and 30 percent more likely to attract venture capital and private equity funds.
“The results of this year’s Index illustrate a growing global commitment to IP-driven creativity and innovation,” said David Hirschmann, president and CEO of GIPC. “The majority of countries took steps to strengthen their IP systems and foster an environment that encourages and incentivizes creators to bring their ideas to market. While a clear pack of leaders in IP protection top the rankings, the leadership gap has narrowed in a new global race to the top. There is still work to be done, and we hope governments will use this Index as a blueprint to further improve their IP ecosystems and grow competitive, knowledge-based economies. When countries invest in strong IP systems, we all benefit.”
This year’s International IP Index added several new indicators. Four new indicators focus on commercialization of IP assets and market access: barriers to technology transfer; registration and disclosure requirements of licensing deals; direct government intervention in setting licensing terms; and tax incentives for the creation of IP assets.
In addition, the Index includes two new indicators on trade secrets and systemic efficiency: protection of trade secrets (criminal sanctions) and targeted incentives for the creation and use of IP assets for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
The United States again received the top overall ranking, earning the distinction of the strongest intellectual property regime in the world. The United States also improved its ranking with respect to patent rights, climbing from the twelfth to second spot.
“The improvement is a result of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reforms, which amount to a modest course correction while creating greater certainty around the inter partes review (IPR) process,” the report states. “This should help to reduce unpredictability in the patent opposition system in the U.S.”
The report also noted several weaknesses U.S. IP system. They included a 2018 congressional proposal for compulsory licensing as a pharmaceutical cost containment policy; continued uncertainty over patentability for high-tech sectors; and the lack of a targeted legal basis for addressing online piracy in line with other global leaders.
Below are several other key takeaways:
As the International IP Index highlights, IP protection is increasingly important to the global markets. For businesses which operate internationally, it is essential to protect your trademarks, patents, copyrights, and trade secrets on a global level. For
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!