Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 1, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC) recently released its International IP Index. The annual report evaluates the intellectual property (IP) environments of 50 world economies and ranks them based on 40 different indicators. The indicators are divided into eight categories of IP protection: patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, commercialization of IP assets, enforcement, systemic efficiency, and membership and ratification of international treaties.
As in the past, the International IP Index highlights that investment in IP protection leads to tangible economic growth. In fact, IP-driven economies are 55 percent more likely to adopt sophisticated, state-of-the-art technology, and are 26 percent more competitive overall. In addition, these economies are twice as likely to produce and export complex, knowledge-intensive products and 30 percent more likely to attract venture capital and private equity funds.
“The results of this year’s Index illustrate a growing global commitment to IP-driven creativity and innovation,” said David Hirschmann, president and CEO of GIPC. “The majority of countries took steps to strengthen their IP systems and foster an environment that encourages and incentivizes creators to bring their ideas to market. While a clear pack of leaders in IP protection top the rankings, the leadership gap has narrowed in a new global race to the top. There is still work to be done, and we hope governments will use this Index as a blueprint to further improve their IP ecosystems and grow competitive, knowledge-based economies. When countries invest in strong IP systems, we all benefit.”
This year’s International IP Index added several new indicators. Four new indicators focus on commercialization of IP assets and market access: barriers to technology transfer; registration and disclosure requirements of licensing deals; direct government intervention in setting licensing terms; and tax incentives for the creation of IP assets.
In addition, the Index includes two new indicators on trade secrets and systemic efficiency: protection of trade secrets (criminal sanctions) and targeted incentives for the creation and use of IP assets for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
The United States again received the top overall ranking, earning the distinction of the strongest intellectual property regime in the world. The United States also improved its ranking with respect to patent rights, climbing from the twelfth to second spot.
“The improvement is a result of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reforms, which amount to a modest course correction while creating greater certainty around the inter partes review (IPR) process,” the report states. “This should help to reduce unpredictability in the patent opposition system in the U.S.”
The report also noted several weaknesses U.S. IP system. They included a 2018 congressional proposal for compulsory licensing as a pharmaceutical cost containment policy; continued uncertainty over patentability for high-tech sectors; and the lack of a targeted legal basis for addressing online piracy in line with other global leaders.
Below are several other key takeaways:
As the International IP Index highlights, IP protection is increasingly important to the global markets. For businesses which operate internationally, it is essential to protect your trademarks, patents, copyrights, and trade secrets on a global level. For
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!