Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Supreme Court Adds Booking.com Trademark Suit to IP Docket

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: December 19, 2019

Key Contacts

Back

SCOTUS Recently Granted Certiorari in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.  The issue before the Court is whether the addition of a generic top-level domain (“.com”) to an otherwise generic term can create a protectable trademark.

Supreme Court Adds Booking.com Trademark Suit to IP Docket

Generic Trademarks

Under the Lanham Act, a trademark is a “word, name, symbol, or device” used by a person “to identify and distinguish his or her goods” in commerce and “to indicate the source of the goods.”  Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World recognized and established a spectrum of trademark strength and categories of protection along that spectrum.  To determine whether a proposed mark is protectable, the USPTO and courts determine the strength of the mark by considering a variety of factors—e.g., the nature of the word, the type of design, and/or the associated product or services—placing the mark into one of four categories of trademark distinctiveness.  Those categories are, in ascending order: (1) generic, (2) descriptive, (3) suggestive, or (4) arbitrary or fanciful.

Generic terms are not entitled to trademark protection because trademarking a generic term would effectively grant the owner a monopoly over a term in common use.  That is, a mark is generic if it is the “common name of a product” or “the genus of which the particular product is a species.” OBX-Stock, Inc. v. Bicast, Inc., 558 F.3d 334, 339–40 (4th Cir. 2009).  Generic terms are not entitled to trademark protection because they do not identify the source of a product or service—they are effectively the name for the product or service itself.

Descriptive terms may be protected, but only if “the registrant shows that [the term] has acquired secondary meaning, i.e., it ‘has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods in commerce.’” Meanwhile, suggestive, arbitrary or fanciful marks are “automatically entitled to protection because they naturally serve to identify a particular source of a product.” Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 768 (1992).

Booking.com Trademark Registration

Booking.com operates a Web site on which customers can book hotel accommodations. In 2012, the company filed four US federal trademark applications for marks that included or consisted of the term “Booking.com.” The applications sought registration for use of the marks in connection with “online hotel reservation services.”

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused registration of the marks.  Instead, the USPTO concluded that the term “booking” is generic for the services for which Booking.com sought registration. Moreover, the addition of the generic top-level domain “.com” did not create a protectable mark.

On appeal, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that the term Booking.com was non-generic. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. It held that the public’s understanding of Booking.com, taken as a whole, establishes it as a descriptive mark rather than a generic term. In support, it cited the USPTO’s lack of evidence demonstrating that the public uses “booking.com” generically. The Fourth Circuit also placed great weight on Booking.com’s Teflon survey, which found that 74.8% of respondents identified Booking.com as a brand name. According to the appeals court, “the survey is strong evidence that the public does not understand Booking.com to refer to the proposed mark’s generic meaning.”

In addition, the Fourth Circuit rejected the USPTO’s argument that adding the top-level domain “.com” to a generic second-level domain like “booking” is necessarily generic. “No circuit has adopted the bright-line rule for which the USPTO advocates—indeed, sister circuits have found that when ‘.com’ is added to a generic TLD, the mark may be protectable upon a sufficient showing of the public’s understanding through consumer surveys or other evidence,” the court wrote.

USPTO Seeking Supreme Court Review

The USPTO is asking the Supreme Court to overrule the Fourth Circuit. As the USPTO highlighted in its petition for certiorari, the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with decisions of the Federal and Ninth Circuits, which have held on materially similar facts that Hotels.com, Advertising.com, Lawyers.com, and Mattress.com are all generic. For instance, the Federal Circuit held that the addition of “.com” does not create a protectable mark, because it conveys only that respondent “operates a commercial website via the internet.” In re Hotels.com, L.P. 573 F.3d 1300, 1304 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

The USPTO also argues that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with existing U.S. Supreme Court precedent. In Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. ., 128 U.S. 598 (1888), the Supreme Court held that the addition of an entity designation like “Company” or “Inc.” to a generic term like “wine,” “cotton,” or “grain” does not create a protectable mark, but instead “only indicates that parties have formed an association or partnership to deal in such goods.” According to the USPTO, “just as no company could register a trademark in ‘Booking Inc.,’ respondent should not be permitted to register a trademark in ‘BOOKING.COM.’”

The Supreme Court has not yet scheduled oral arguments. Nonetheless, a decision is expected before the term ends next June.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!