Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 31, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAs the Boy Scouts of America begins to allow girls into its ranks, it’s coexistence with the Girl Scouts of the United States of America is on shaky ground. In a trademark infringement lawsuit filed in New York district court, the Girl Scouts of the United States of America (Girls Scouts or GSUSA) allege that Boys Scouts of America (Boy Scouts or BSA) is causing significant consumer confusion with the way it is touting its new programs.
“BSA is now using its trademarks in a manner that is both new and uniquely damaging to GSUSA,” the complaint in Girl Scouts of the United States of America v. Boy Scouts of America maintains. “Such misconduct will … marginalize the Girl Scouts movement by causing the public to believe that GSUSA’s extraordinarily successful services are not true or official ‘Scouting’ programs.”
The Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts both have congressional charters under which they are granted the exclusive rights to emblems, badges, marks and words associated with “Girl Scouts” and “Boy Scouts,” respectively. While each organization offers youth development services and programs with the word “Scout,” “Scouts” and “Scouting”, the terms have traditionally either been preceded by words like “Boy” or “Girl” that have highlighted the gender-specific nature of each organization’s programs, or appeared in a context making clear that the programs at issue were developed by one organization or the other.
Last year, the Boy Scouts announced that it would begin admitting girls. In May, the organization further announced that it was changing the name of the organization to “Scouts BSA” and that its members would be called “Scouts.” In connection with these changes, the Boy Scouts launched the Scout Me In campaign, which the Boy Scouts says celebrates its “expansion to serve families and welcome girls and boys into Scouting in communities across the country.”
The Girl Scouts’ trademark infringement lawsuit maintains that the Boy Scouts’ new programs for girls and associated marketing campaigns are infringing their right to use the “Scout” and “Scouting” marks in marketing to girls. According to the suit: “With respect to the term SCOUTS and SCOUTING in particular, by virtue of the long history of use of the GIRL SCOUTS trademark by GSUSA, the consuming public has come to recognize SCOUTS and SCOUTING as trademarks that, like the other GS Marks, belong exclusively to GSUSA when used in connection with leadership programs and related services for girls. The Girl Scouts further maintain:
BSA does not have the right under either federal or New York law to use terms like SCOUTS or SCOUTING by themselves in connection with services offered to girls, or to rebrand itself as “the Scouts” and thereby falsely communicate to the American public that it is now the organization exclusively associated with leadership development services offered under that mark to girls. Such misconduct will not only cause confusion among the public, damage the goodwill of GSUSA’s GIRL SCOUTS trademarks, and erode its core brand identity, but it will also marginalize the GIRL SCOUTS Movement by causing the public to believe that GSUSA’s extraordinarily successful services are not true or official “Scouting” programs, but niche services with limited utility and appeal.
The Girl Scouts’ complaint also argues that the Boy Scouts’ trademark misuse is leading to widespread consumer confusion. “Since BSA’s announcement that it would admit girls to its core programs, GSUSA’s fears about the damage that would be caused to its trademarks and the mission those trademarks symbolize have been realized,” the complaint states. “Throughout the country, families, schools and communities have been told that GSUSA and BSA have merged, or even that GSUSA no longer exists. Parents interested in signing up for Girl Scouts programs have instead mistakenly signed up for the new girls’ programs offered by BSA.”
This is not the first lawsuit between the Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts. In 1915, when the Girl Guides changed their name to “Girl Scouts”, the Boy Scouts sued them, alleging that they has “sissified” the word “Scout”.
The pending Girl Scouts’ suit seeks a court order blocking the Boy Scouts from using the term “Scout,” “Scouts,” “Scouting” or “Scouts BSA” without an “inherently distinctive or distinguishing term appearing immediately before it.” We will report on further developments.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!