With the price of Bitcoin rising and blockchain technology gaining increasing legitimacy, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOS) are gaining popularity with investors. However, as highlighted by two recent SEC enforcement actions, ICOs are extremely risky investments and in some cases, may be completely fraudulent. In such cases, private investors have available remedies that include prosecuting their own lawsuits alleging fraud and even Civil RICO claims where a pattern and other requisite facts can be alleged.
As more fully discussed in a prior article, businesses are increasingly using initial coin offerings, also called token sales, to raise capital. Virtual coins are created and disseminated using distributed ledger or blockchain technology. Purchasers may use U.S. dollars or virtual currencies to purchase virtual coins or tokens.
The profits of ICOs may be used to fund the development of a digital platform, software, or other projects. In addition, investors may use the virtual tokens or coins to access the platform, use the software, or otherwise participate in the project. After they are issued, the virtual coins or tokens may also be resold to others in a secondary market on virtual currency exchanges or other platforms.
The Securities and Exchange (SEC) recently brought enforcement actions against two companies for defrauding investors in ICOs purportedly backed by investments in real estate and diamonds. According to the agency, Maksim Zaslavskiy and his companies lured investors by touting a novel technology that would deliver substantial returns. However, the digital coins didn’t really exist.
According to the SEC’s complaint, investors in REcoin Group Foundation and DRC World (also known as Diamond Reserve Club) were promised sizeable returns from the companies’ operations. However, neither company had any real operations.
Zaslavskiy allegedly touted REcoin as “The First Ever Cryptocurrency Backed by Real Estate.” Although he also told investors that the company had a “team of lawyers, professionals, brokers, and accountants” that would invest the ICO proceeds into real estate, none had been hired or even consulted. Zaslavskiy and REcoin also allegedly misrepresented that they had raised between $2 million and $4 million from investors when the actual amount was approximately $300,000.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Zaslavskiy used his Diamond Reserve Club to execute a similar fraud. Zaslavskiy represented to investors that the company invests in diamonds and obtains discounts with product retailers for individuals who purchase “memberships” in the company. In reality, the SEC alleges that Zaslavskiy and Diamond have not purchased any diamonds nor engaged in any business operations.
Based on the false representations and the sale of unregistered securities, the SEC is seeking permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties. For Zaslavskiy, the SEC also seeks an officer-and-director bar and a bar from participating in any offering of digital securities.
Remedies for Investors Defrauded in Coin Offerings
Defrauded ICO investors will have viable claims, with the biggest obstacle to actual recovery of their losses being finding recoverable assets. While some investments are governed by federal securities laws, most ICOs are not regulated and/or are based overseas. So when something goes wrong, following the money and tracing the assets or the fraudsters after obtaining a judgment is the required effort if no settlement is negotiated.
As the SEC highlighted in a recent Investor Alert, third-party wallet services, payment processors, and virtual currency exchanges that are involved in the use and exchange of virtual currencies may also be located outside of the United States or be operating unlawfully. In addition, regulators and law enforcement agencies face a range of challenges in investigating ICO fraud. As detailed by the SEC, they include:
Tracing money: Traditional financial institutions (such as banks) often are not involved with ICOs or virtual currency transactions, making it more difficult to follow the flow of money.
International scope: ICOs and virtual currency transactions and users span the globe. Although the SEC regularly obtains information from abroad (such as through cross-border agreements), there may be restrictions on how the SEC can use the information and it may take more time to get the information. In some cases, the SEC may be unable to obtain information from persons or entities located overseas.
No central authority: As there is no central authority that collects virtual currency user information, the SEC generally must rely on other sources for this type of information.
Freezing or securing virtual currency: Law enforcement officials may have difficulty freezing or securing investor funds that are held in a virtual currency. Virtual currency wallets are encrypted and unlike money held in a bank or brokerage account, virtual currencies may not be held by a third-party custodian.
For investors, there are several steps that you can take to increase the chances that you may recover some of your investment losses. For instance, it is imperative to report the fraud to state and federal securities regulations as soon as you suspect something is wrong. This could be important to enable a freeze on assets before they are transferred. In most cases, scammers will quickly try to cover their tracks. Defrauded investors should consult with experienced counsel as soon as possible. A knowledgeable attorney can help determine whether any securities laws were violated and take steps to pursue all available legal remedies. I have successfully pursued civil RICO claims, and I found the treble damages and recoverable legal fees provisions authorized for civil RICO claims helpful in negotiating the settlement of civil RICO claims.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Commercial Zoning: What Every Business Owner Needs to Know
If you operate a business, you need to understand how commercial zoning rules may impact you. For instance, zoning regulations can determine how you can develop a property and what type of activities your business can conduct. To ensure that you aren’t taken by surprise, it is always a good idea to consult with experienced […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Investor Recourse for Initial Coin Offering Fraud
Author: Dan Brecher
Investor Recourse for Initial Coin Offering Fraud
With the price of Bitcoin rising and blockchain technology gaining increasing legitimacy, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOS) are gaining popularity with investors. However, as highlighted by two recent SEC enforcement actions, ICOs are extremely risky investments and in some cases, may be completely fraudulent. In such cases, private investors have available remedies that include prosecuting their own lawsuits alleging fraud and even Civil RICO claims where a pattern and other requisite facts can be alleged.
As more fully discussed in a prior article, businesses are increasingly using initial coin offerings, also called token sales, to raise capital. Virtual coins are created and disseminated using distributed ledger or blockchain technology. Purchasers may use U.S. dollars or virtual currencies to purchase virtual coins or tokens.
The profits of ICOs may be used to fund the development of a digital platform, software, or other projects. In addition, investors may use the virtual tokens or coins to access the platform, use the software, or otherwise participate in the project. After they are issued, the virtual coins or tokens may also be resold to others in a secondary market on virtual currency exchanges or other platforms.
The Securities and Exchange (SEC) recently brought enforcement actions against two companies for defrauding investors in ICOs purportedly backed by investments in real estate and diamonds. According to the agency, Maksim Zaslavskiy and his companies lured investors by touting a novel technology that would deliver substantial returns. However, the digital coins didn’t really exist.
According to the SEC’s complaint, investors in REcoin Group Foundation and DRC World (also known as Diamond Reserve Club) were promised sizeable returns from the companies’ operations. However, neither company had any real operations.
Zaslavskiy allegedly touted REcoin as “The First Ever Cryptocurrency Backed by Real Estate.” Although he also told investors that the company had a “team of lawyers, professionals, brokers, and accountants” that would invest the ICO proceeds into real estate, none had been hired or even consulted. Zaslavskiy and REcoin also allegedly misrepresented that they had raised between $2 million and $4 million from investors when the actual amount was approximately $300,000.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Zaslavskiy used his Diamond Reserve Club to execute a similar fraud. Zaslavskiy represented to investors that the company invests in diamonds and obtains discounts with product retailers for individuals who purchase “memberships” in the company. In reality, the SEC alleges that Zaslavskiy and Diamond have not purchased any diamonds nor engaged in any business operations.
Based on the false representations and the sale of unregistered securities, the SEC is seeking permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties. For Zaslavskiy, the SEC also seeks an officer-and-director bar and a bar from participating in any offering of digital securities.
Remedies for Investors Defrauded in Coin Offerings
Defrauded ICO investors will have viable claims, with the biggest obstacle to actual recovery of their losses being finding recoverable assets. While some investments are governed by federal securities laws, most ICOs are not regulated and/or are based overseas. So when something goes wrong, following the money and tracing the assets or the fraudsters after obtaining a judgment is the required effort if no settlement is negotiated.
As the SEC highlighted in a recent Investor Alert, third-party wallet services, payment processors, and virtual currency exchanges that are involved in the use and exchange of virtual currencies may also be located outside of the United States or be operating unlawfully. In addition, regulators and law enforcement agencies face a range of challenges in investigating ICO fraud. As detailed by the SEC, they include:
Tracing money: Traditional financial institutions (such as banks) often are not involved with ICOs or virtual currency transactions, making it more difficult to follow the flow of money.
International scope: ICOs and virtual currency transactions and users span the globe. Although the SEC regularly obtains information from abroad (such as through cross-border agreements), there may be restrictions on how the SEC can use the information and it may take more time to get the information. In some cases, the SEC may be unable to obtain information from persons or entities located overseas.
No central authority: As there is no central authority that collects virtual currency user information, the SEC generally must rely on other sources for this type of information.
Freezing or securing virtual currency: Law enforcement officials may have difficulty freezing or securing investor funds that are held in a virtual currency. Virtual currency wallets are encrypted and unlike money held in a bank or brokerage account, virtual currencies may not be held by a third-party custodian.
For investors, there are several steps that you can take to increase the chances that you may recover some of your investment losses. For instance, it is imperative to report the fraud to state and federal securities regulations as soon as you suspect something is wrong. This could be important to enable a freeze on assets before they are transferred. In most cases, scammers will quickly try to cover their tracks. Defrauded investors should consult with experienced counsel as soon as possible. A knowledgeable attorney can help determine whether any securities laws were violated and take steps to pursue all available legal remedies. I have successfully pursued civil RICO claims, and I found the treble damages and recoverable legal fees provisions authorized for civil RICO claims helpful in negotiating the settlement of civil RICO claims.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
