The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently fined five units of ING Groep NV a total of $1.2 million for failing to retain or review millions of emails.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently fined five units of ING Groep NV a total of $1.2 million for failing to retain or review millions of emails. The penalties highlight the importance of email retention policies and procedures, particularly for regulated companies.
According to FINRA, the firms failed to properly configure hundreds of employee email accounts to ensure that messages were retained and reviewed. In addition, four of the subsidiaries did not have systems in place to retain certain types of emails, including emails sent to distribution lists, emails received as blind carbon copies, and “cloud” email (emails sent through third-party systems). Because the emails were not retained, they were not subject to supervisory review
In addition to retention violations, FINRA also found that four of the firms failed to review millions of emails that the firms’ email review software had flagged for supervisory review. Overall, supervisory principals did not evaluate nearly six million emails flagged for review because the email review software was not properly configured.
As this case makes clear, New York and New Jersey firms regulated by FINRA must follow strict guidelines for email archiving. In fact, in announcing the fines, Brad Bennett, executive vice president and chief of enforcement, made it clear that “email retention and review continues to be an important regulatory responsibility and an issue of concern for FINRA.”
Under FINRA’s Books & Records Rule (3110),member firms are required to make and preserve accounts, records, memoranda, books and correspondence in conformity with all applicable regulations, statements, and rules under SEC 17a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, record retention procedures must comply with SEC Rule 17a-4. Overall, keeping detailed records allows firms to clearly demonstrate that they have fulfilled both their investor and regulatory obligations.
If you have any questions about the case or would like to discuss your business’s email retention policies, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
