
Michael J. Sheppeard
Partner
212-784-6939 msheppeard@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Michael J. Sheppeard
Date: September 29, 2020
Partner
212-784-6939 msheppeard@sh-law.comAlthough COVID-19 remains a top compliance concern for New York and New Jersey employers, it’s important to remember that regulators continue to address a wide range of other issues. On August 5, 2020, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released new guidance regarding opioid addiction and employment.
Opioid misuse and associated overdoses have become a public health crisis over the past several years. By definition, “opioids” include prescription drugs such as codeine, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and meperidine, as well as illegal drugs like heroin.
In 2016, opioid overdoses accounted for more than 42,000 deaths, more than any previous year on record. Of the overdose deaths, approximately 40% involved a prescription opioid. Data collected in 2018 data shows that 128 people in the United States die after overdosing on opioids every day.
The opioid crisis does not just impact drug users and their families. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the total “economic burden” of prescription opioid misuse alone in the United States is $78.5 billion a year, including the costs of healthcare, lost productivity, addiction treatment, and criminal justice involvement.
Opioids are also a concern for employers. Substance use disorder impacts workplace safety, health care costs, productivity, absenteeism, and job performance.
The EEOC’s recent guidance, Use of Codeine, Oxycodone, and Other Opioids: Information for Employees, addresses how employers must address opioid use by employees under the ADA. It makes clear that current illegal drug use is not a covered disability. Accordingly, if a worker is using heroin or opioid medication without a valid prescription, the ADA does not prohibit employers from firing employees, denying employment to job applicants, or taking other negative employment actions based on the current illegal use of drugs.
Conversely, workers who are lawfully using opioid medication, are in treatment for opioid addiction and are receiving Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT), or have been in recovery for their addiction, are protected from discrimination under the ADA. Accordingly, if an employee’s opioid use is legal, employers can’t automatically disqualify the employee because of opioid use without considering if there is a way for the employee to perform the job safely and effectively. In such cases, employers may be required to provide a reasonable accommodation.
Below are several other key takeaways from the EEOC guidance:
The EEOC also published additional guidance aimed at health professionals. The document, entitled “How Health Care Providers Can Help Current and Former Patients Who Have Used Opioids Stay Employed,” addresses patients’ legal rights in the workplace. As the EEOC notes, medical providers are often key participants in the interactive process between employers and workers as employers seek to understand the employee’s condition and potential need for reasonable accommodation. The fact sheet provides an overview of ADA coverage and offers guidance to health care workers seeking to provide documentation of covered disabilities on behalf of their patients.
While opioid-related deaths declined in 2019, health experts expect that the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will fuel the crisis. To maintain a healthy workplace, employers should encourage workers to use their health insurance as well as any available Employee Assistance Program (EAP) to address their mental or chemical health needs. Employers may also want to consider policies and procedures that promote overall wellness and self-care, support long-term recovery, and seek to reduce stigma surrounding drug use for those seeking assistance. With regard to regulatory compliance, it is important that employers understand their obligations under laws like ADA. As the EEOC guidance highlights, employers have certain obligations to accommodate an employee’s opioid use and treatment for opioid addiction under the law.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Michael Sheppeard, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!