
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 5, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comHandy Hardware Wholesale, Inc., a dealer-owned hardware wholesale group operating in 14 states filed for Chapter 11 protection under bankruptcy law after a costly expansion straddled it with debt.
Handy filed for protection from its creditors in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware. The wholesale group has roughly 1,000 members, who wholly own the company, and 1,300 facilities that include retail hardware stores, home centers, and lumber yards. The group formed in an effort to make it more competitive against big box chains, such as Lowe’s and Home Depot. However, the company ran into financial trouble following its expansion into the southeastern U.S., according to Dow Jones Newswires.
Handy Hardware constructed a 460,000 square-foot distribution center and warehouse in Mississippi during the midst of the recession in 2009. As a result of higher costs taken on by the company to build the center, coupled with falling revenue that resulted from the down economy, Handy Hardware was unable to stay afloat and meet its operating costs. In 2011 alone, the company reported a loss of $8.4 million.
The company listed assets of $50 million and debt totaling $100 million in its court filing. In addition to bond debt, the company owes roughly $14.6 million to its largest secured creditor, Wells Fargo, the news source reports. Following the bankruptcy filing, Wells Fargo agreed to extend a $30 million dollar loan to the distressed company, which refinances the $14.6 million owed and offers $15.4 million in new financing, Dow Jones reports.
Although the company has not announced the specifics of its reorganization plan, members said they hope to emerge from proceedings in a stronger position, and still plan to operate as a member-owned company.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!