
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 9, 2017

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Helping Angels Lead Our Startups (HALOS) Act.

The goal of the legislation is to remove regulatory roadblocks that may prevent start-ups from securing funds from angel investors by clarifying what types of communications constitute a general solicitation and subsequently trigger the verification procedures needed to confirm that investors are “accredited.”
Companies seeking to raise capital through the issuance of securities must either register the securities with the SEC or rely on an exemption from registration, most commonly Rule 506 of Regulation D (Reg D). In 2013, the SEC amended Reg D to eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising, so long as the issuer takes reasonable steps to verify that all investors are accredited.
The new rules, which were mandated under the JOBS Act, offer significant marketing opportunities for startups and other private issuers. However, the SEC has also raised the bar when it comes to verifying an investor’s “accredited” status. Many of the verification methods approved by the agency generally require the provision of sensitive financial information, which raises privacy and compliance concerns among both issuers and investors.
The HALOS Act is intended to address concerns that the amendments to Rule 506 may have imposed an unintentional difficulty on fundraising by startups and other businesses. The proposed legislation would allow startups to make presentations to prospective investors at events, such as demo days sponsored by angel investors and other venture capital groups, without running afoul of Reg D.
“The HALOS Act will directly help startups who face the highest risks, but also have the greatest potential,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy stated. “By removing arbitrary rules and allowing angel investors to play a bigger role in funding startups, we give potentially transformative startups more opportunity to get the capital they need early on to stay afloat, grow, and perhaps one day change the world.”
The proposed legislation would specifically clarify the definition of general solicitation as not applying to a presentation, communication, or event:
Sponsored by federal, state, or local government; a college or university; non-profit; established angel group; venture forum, venture capital association or trade association; or any other group approved by the SEC
Whose advertising does not make any specific investment offerings
Whose sponsor does not make investment recommendations, provide investment advice to attendees, engage in investment negotiations, or charge any entrance fees other than what covers the administrative cost of the event
Where no specific information regarding investments is communicated by the issuer other than that they are offering securities, the type and amount of securities being offered, the amount of securities still available, and the intended use of the funding.
The House passed the Halos Act in its last session; however, the legislation failed to advance in the Senate. Now that the Republicans are in control, the legislation arguably has a much greater chance of becoming law. We will be closely following the status of this legislation and will post updates as they become available. We have recently suggested some improvements needed to resolve issues hampering crowdfunding that also arise from rules promulgated pursuant to the JOBS Act. We encourage business owners to check back for updates on the HALOS Act and other bills that may impact your startup.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!