Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 30, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Governor characterized the law as over broad, and he offered recommended changes that would make the law less burdensome for employers.
As we previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, A-2878 would prohibit employers from requiring a prospective employee to provide their user name, password, or other information needed to access social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook. Under the proposed law, employers, who violate the law, would face civil penalties of $1,000 for the first offense and $2,500 for repeat violations.
While Governor Chris Christie acknowledged the privacy concerns of job candidates and employees, he stated that their rights must be balanced with an employer’s need to hire appropriate personnel, manage its operations and safeguard its business assets and proprietary information. His conditional veto message echoed the concerns raised by the business community that the bill “paints with too broad a brush.”
To more properly balance the needs of employers and applicants/employees, Governor Chris Christie made several suggested changes. Most notably, the Governor’s version would eliminate the private cause of action for employees. Rather, the law would be enforced solely through the Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development, which would impose monetary fines for violations.
Governor Chris Christie’s version would still prohibit employers from requesting social media passwords from job applicants, but it would not ban asking about the existence of such accounts altogether. As noted in Governor Chris Christie’s veto message, an employer interviewing a candidate for a marketing job should be allowed to ask about the applicant’s use of social networking so as to gauge his or her technological skills and media savvy.
In another recommended change, employers would be able to inquire into an employee’s social media activities to investigate work-related misconduct, including the transfer of proprietary information to an employee’s personal account. Employers would also not be prohibited from accessing an employee’s or applicant’s social media pages to the extent that they are publicly available.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!