For online retailers, it is important to take the bad with the good when it comes to online reviews...
For online retailers, it is important to take the bad with the good when it comes to online reviews. If not, you could face enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The FTC recently announced that online fashion retailer Fashion Nova, LLC will pay $4.2 million to settle allegations that the company blocked negative reviews of its products from being posted to its website. “Deceptive review practices cheat consumers, undercut honest businesses, and pollute online commerce,” Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a press statement. “Fashion Nova is being held accountable for these practices, and other firms should take note.”
What Did the FTC Allege?
According to the FTC’s complaint, Fashion Nova is a “fast fashion” apparel company based in California. Each product page on the Fashion Nova website provides consumers with the opportunity to review the product and rate it on a five-star scale. At the bottom of each product page is a button labeled “Write a Review.” Consumers who click on the button are encouraged to give the product a star rating from one to five, write a review, and “Post” it. If there are no customer reviews for a particular product, consumers are encouraged to “Be the First to Write a Review.” Fashion Nova also sent its customers emails soliciting product reviews of the customers’ recent purchases. Each product page with existing reviews displayed the product’s average star rating and a summary graph of the number of reviews with each star rating, followed by individual consumers’ reviews and ratings.
According to the FTC, Fashion Nova installed a third-party online product review management interface, which allows users to choose to have certain reviews automatically post based upon their star ratings and hold lower-starred reviews for client approval prior to posting. From as early as late 2015 through mid-November 2019, Fashion Nova chose to have four- and five-star reviews automatically post to the website, but did not approve or publish hundreds of thousands lower-starred, more negative reviews.
The FTC’s complaint alleged that the product reviews on the Fashion Nova website did not accurately reflect the views of all purchasers who submitted reviews of the products because in numerous instances the company suppressed product reviews with ratings lower than four stars. These practices constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, according to the FTC. Section 5(a) authorizes the FTC to investigate and challenge “unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce.”
What Are the Consequences for the Online Retailer?
Under the proposed settlement, Fashion Nova will pay $4.2 million. The retailer will also be prohibited from making misrepresentations about any customer reviews or other endorsements. In addition, it must post on its website all customer reviews of products currently being sold—with the exception of reviews that contain obscene, sexually explicit, racist, or unlawful content and reviews that are unrelated to the product or customer services like shipping or returns.
Is Additional Enforcement on the Horizon?
The FTC also announced that it is sending letters to 10 companies offering review management services, placing them on notice that avoiding the collection or publication of negative reviews violates the FTC Act. As discussed in prior articles, the FTC also has enforcement authority over online reviews under the Consumer Review Fairness Act (CRFA). The statute prohibits companies from employing a contract provision that bars or restricts review of a company’s products, services, or conduct; imposes a penalty or fee against someone who provides a review; or mandates surrender of intellectual property rights in the content of reviews.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Michael Sheppeard, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
FTC Settles Enforcement Action Against Retailer for Failing to Post Negative Online Reviews
Author: Michael J. Sheppeard
For online retailers, it is important to take the bad with the good when it comes to online reviews...
For online retailers, it is important to take the bad with the good when it comes to online reviews. If not, you could face enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The FTC recently announced that online fashion retailer Fashion Nova, LLC will pay $4.2 million to settle allegations that the company blocked negative reviews of its products from being posted to its website. “Deceptive review practices cheat consumers, undercut honest businesses, and pollute online commerce,” Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a press statement. “Fashion Nova is being held accountable for these practices, and other firms should take note.”
What Did the FTC Allege?
According to the FTC’s complaint, Fashion Nova is a “fast fashion” apparel company based in California. Each product page on the Fashion Nova website provides consumers with the opportunity to review the product and rate it on a five-star scale. At the bottom of each product page is a button labeled “Write a Review.” Consumers who click on the button are encouraged to give the product a star rating from one to five, write a review, and “Post” it. If there are no customer reviews for a particular product, consumers are encouraged to “Be the First to Write a Review.” Fashion Nova also sent its customers emails soliciting product reviews of the customers’ recent purchases. Each product page with existing reviews displayed the product’s average star rating and a summary graph of the number of reviews with each star rating, followed by individual consumers’ reviews and ratings.
According to the FTC, Fashion Nova installed a third-party online product review management interface, which allows users to choose to have certain reviews automatically post based upon their star ratings and hold lower-starred reviews for client approval prior to posting. From as early as late 2015 through mid-November 2019, Fashion Nova chose to have four- and five-star reviews automatically post to the website, but did not approve or publish hundreds of thousands lower-starred, more negative reviews.
The FTC’s complaint alleged that the product reviews on the Fashion Nova website did not accurately reflect the views of all purchasers who submitted reviews of the products because in numerous instances the company suppressed product reviews with ratings lower than four stars. These practices constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, according to the FTC. Section 5(a) authorizes the FTC to investigate and challenge “unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce.”
What Are the Consequences for the Online Retailer?
Under the proposed settlement, Fashion Nova will pay $4.2 million. The retailer will also be prohibited from making misrepresentations about any customer reviews or other endorsements. In addition, it must post on its website all customer reviews of products currently being sold—with the exception of reviews that contain obscene, sexually explicit, racist, or unlawful content and reviews that are unrelated to the product or customer services like shipping or returns.
Is Additional Enforcement on the Horizon?
The FTC also announced that it is sending letters to 10 companies offering review management services, placing them on notice that avoiding the collection or publication of negative reviews violates the FTC Act. As discussed in prior articles, the FTC also has enforcement authority over online reviews under the Consumer Review Fairness Act (CRFA). The statute prohibits companies from employing a contract provision that bars or restricts review of a company’s products, services, or conduct; imposes a penalty or fee against someone who provides a review; or mandates surrender of intellectual property rights in the content of reviews.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Michael Sheppeard, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
