Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 13, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced an adjustment to the maximum civil penalty dollar amounts for violations of 16 provisions of law under the agency’s jurisdiction. The FTC fines hike is noteworthy given the agency’s stepped-up enforcement efforts in a number of key areas, including deceptive advertising, data security, and Clayton Act compliance.
The FTC fines increase is required by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015, which directs agencies to implement a “catch-up” inflation adjustment based on a specific formula. The new maximum civil penalty amounts are scheduled to take effect on August 1, 2016.
The maximum civil penalty amount has increased from $16,000 to $40,000 for the following violations, as well as several others listed in the Federal Register Notice:
The fee hikes are significant for several reasons. First, for businesses contemplating a merger or acquisition, the fee hikes highlight that it is imperative to determine if the transaction will trigger pre-merger notification requirements under the HSR Act. Under the statute, companies proposing a merger or acquisition must notify regulators and satisfy a mandatory waiting period (usually 30 days) if the size of the parties involved and the value of the transaction exceeds certain filing thresholds, absent an applicable exemption.
Second, for continuing violations, each day is a separate violation. As a result, the maximum civil penalty may be multiplied by the number of days for each violation of the applicable statute. Third, courts will apply a multi-factor test in assessing whether a maximum fee could be mitigated. These factors include the degree of culpability of the violator, prior history of the violator’s conduct, the violator’s ability to pay, and the effect on the violator’s ability to continue to do business. Small businesses may also benefit from the agency’s civil penalty leniency program, which establishes criteria the FTC will consider when determining the propriety of a penalty waiver or reduction for small businesses that are not in compliance with the law.
The official FTC notice can be viewed here.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
If you operate a business, you need to understand how commercial zoning rules may impact you. For instance, zoning regulations can determine how you can develop a property and what type of activities your business can conduct. To ensure that you aren’t taken by surprise, it is always a good idea to consult with experienced […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced an adjustment to the maximum civil penalty dollar amounts for violations of 16 provisions of law under the agency’s jurisdiction. The FTC fines hike is noteworthy given the agency’s stepped-up enforcement efforts in a number of key areas, including deceptive advertising, data security, and Clayton Act compliance.
The FTC fines increase is required by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015, which directs agencies to implement a “catch-up” inflation adjustment based on a specific formula. The new maximum civil penalty amounts are scheduled to take effect on August 1, 2016.
The maximum civil penalty amount has increased from $16,000 to $40,000 for the following violations, as well as several others listed in the Federal Register Notice:
The fee hikes are significant for several reasons. First, for businesses contemplating a merger or acquisition, the fee hikes highlight that it is imperative to determine if the transaction will trigger pre-merger notification requirements under the HSR Act. Under the statute, companies proposing a merger or acquisition must notify regulators and satisfy a mandatory waiting period (usually 30 days) if the size of the parties involved and the value of the transaction exceeds certain filing thresholds, absent an applicable exemption.
Second, for continuing violations, each day is a separate violation. As a result, the maximum civil penalty may be multiplied by the number of days for each violation of the applicable statute. Third, courts will apply a multi-factor test in assessing whether a maximum fee could be mitigated. These factors include the degree of culpability of the violator, prior history of the violator’s conduct, the violator’s ability to pay, and the effect on the violator’s ability to continue to do business. Small businesses may also benefit from the agency’s civil penalty leniency program, which establishes criteria the FTC will consider when determining the propriety of a penalty waiver or reduction for small businesses that are not in compliance with the law.
The official FTC notice can be viewed here.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!