
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFacebook’s Initial Public Offering (IPO) received a great deal of attention, especially after the price of its stock dropped shortly after its first day of trading. The decline in price dominated the news for weeks. While driving to the office this week, I listened to Bloomberg report that Facebook’s stock price hit $50 a share on September 26, 2013. The Bloomberg report validated the planning strategies undertaken by the Facebook insiders and demonstrates that the timing of a transfer may yield incalculable benefits.
On June 4, 2012, I wrote about a Facebook insider who expatriated from the U.S. to Singapore. Mr. Eduardo Saverin relinquished his U.S. citizenship in September 2011, months before the public offering on May 18, 2012. The act of expatriation causes the departing United States citizen to recognize gain on a deemed sale of all of his assets. Assuming a market value of $25 per share at the time of expatriation, the timing of Mr. Saverin’s departure appears to have saved him hundreds of millions of dollars in income and estate taxes. Given that the IPO price was not set and the sluggish economy, the figure actually used may have been lower than my estimate. After all, we were coming out of a recession and there were no other comparable transactions in the market. Any estimate of value in 2011 was tempered by doom and gloom of a moribund economy and an uninspired or non-existent IPO market. The timing of Mr. Saverin’s departure worked to his advantage.
On June 11, 2012, I wrote about Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRAT) and the various strategies one might put in place to hedge a decline in price. The news was filled with stories of Facebook insiders who remained U.S. citizens and utilized GRATs or rolling GRATs (as described in my blog on July 25, 2012). When we look back to May 2012, these insiders saved themselves an incredible amount of money. In our gift tax system, we must value the gift upon the date of transfer. The stock price has nearly doubled in value and approximately one-half of an insider’s wealth may have been moved outside of the transfer tax system. Assume the transfer to the GRAT is valued at $26 per share and the value rises to $50, this means that $24 per share passes to the remainder without being subject to gift tax.
Corporate insiders and knowledgeable investors anticipate when stock and asset values will rise. In today’s slow or low growth economy, each day brings us closer to more normal economic activity and increasing asset values. Thus, it appears that we should be able to anticipate escalating asset prices in the coming years. Now would be an ideal time to transfer appreciating assets to a GRAT in order to lock in the lower values for purposes of the computations required by the transfer tax system.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!