James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Estate tax is often a confusing and difficult field in normal circumstances, but things can really get complicated when an estate’s holdings are unusual.
One of those unusual holdings is art, which is notoriously difficult to value. A recent ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court may serve to clarify the way that art can be treated under estate tax law.
Affluent families that hold valuable pieces of art are often loath to part with them. If sentimental reasons aren’t enough, frequently, the 28 percent capital gains tax on any appreciation of value is, according to Forbes. However, if an estate breaks the federal estate tax exemption, these pieces of art are included in the estate tax bill at full market value.
James Elkins Jr., a prominent Houston, Texas businessman, and his wife who died before him gave partial shares of their art to their children, according to The New York Times. This tactic is common for more typical assets, like real estate or private business holdings. By transferring shares out of their names, but retaining a controlling share in many, Elkins and his wife were able to keep their art on their walls but reduce their eventual tax liability upon death.
However, the IRS avoids giving discounts on art, because it is difficult to sell shares independently, the news source explained. Art can only be in one place at a time, and a severe discount would be necessary to sell less than a controlling share to a non-family member, as this new owner would have little say in where the art is displayed, for example. For this reason, the IRS claimed that no discount should apply to the art.
Now, in a major victory for the estate and art collectors across the nation, the Fifth Circuit has ordered that the IRS return $14.4 million to the Elkins family and said that the estate’s initial 47.5 percent discount should be applied, according to Forbes.
Confused about your own estate taxes? Talk to a Scarinci Hollenbeck tax attorney today!
- Industries: Real Estate
- Practices: Commercial Real Estate, Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.