James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Estate tax is often a confusing and difficult field in normal circumstances, but things can really get complicated when an estate’s holdings are unusual.
One of those unusual holdings is art, which is notoriously difficult to value. A recent ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court may serve to clarify the way that art can be treated under estate tax law.
Affluent families that hold valuable pieces of art are often loath to part with them. If sentimental reasons aren’t enough, frequently, the 28 percent capital gains tax on any appreciation of value is, according to Forbes. However, if an estate breaks the federal estate tax exemption, these pieces of art are included in the estate tax bill at full market value.
James Elkins Jr., a prominent Houston, Texas businessman, and his wife who died before him gave partial shares of their art to their children, according to The New York Times. This tactic is common for more typical assets, like real estate or private business holdings. By transferring shares out of their names, but retaining a controlling share in many, Elkins and his wife were able to keep their art on their walls but reduce their eventual tax liability upon death.
However, the IRS avoids giving discounts on art, because it is difficult to sell shares independently, the news source explained. Art can only be in one place at a time, and a severe discount would be necessary to sell less than a controlling share to a non-family member, as this new owner would have little say in where the art is displayed, for example. For this reason, the IRS claimed that no discount should apply to the art.
Now, in a major victory for the estate and art collectors across the nation, the Fifth Circuit has ordered that the IRS return $14.4 million to the Elkins family and said that the estate’s initial 47.5 percent discount should be applied, according to Forbes.
Confused about your own estate taxes? Talk to a Scarinci Hollenbeck tax attorney today!
- Industries: Real Estate
- Practices: Commercial Real Estate, Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect
A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease
A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.