James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Estate of Turco: Is There Clawback For Insufficient Estate Tax Funds?
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 15, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The lack of liquidity is a serious problem in the administration of an Estate, especially for a fiduciary with the potential for personal liability. The lack of liquidity can arise from no planning, illiquid assets or an unforeseen change in circumstances or market conditions. Federal estate tax is due nine months after death; however, it may not be possible to sell assets within that period. The dramatic decline in market values after death or the valuation date creates severe problems as seen below.
The New Jersey case, Estate of Turco, illustrates how adverse market conditions can harm an estate. The decedent died in March 2005 (or six months later with alternate valuation) and the appraisals of the estate produced a $30,000,000 gross estate for federal tax purposes. You may recall the tightening of the credit markets in 2007, followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. The estate is obligated to pay an estate tax calculated on asset values that could not be realized in the current marketplace.
There are two other important facts to note. First, there was $4.5m of life insurance that was paid to trusts for the decedent’s grandchildren, who were designated as the primary beneficiaries of the proceeds. Second, the Will required that all taxes were to be paid from the residuary estate.
The court declared the estate insolvent at the administrator’s request. The administrator requested that he be authorized to clawback funds from the non-probate assets and specific bequests. The Court held that it was too soon to consider clawback and instructed the administrator to seek a compromise with the IRS before requesting such authority.
The court’s opinion noted that the administrator did not have the statutory power under federal or state law to recover taxes from non-probate assets, especially where there is a specific clause in the Will instructing on the source of funds for payment of taxes.
The nightmare for advisors is the rapid decline in asset values without the corresponding liquidity. One must remember the grandchildren’s trust received life insurance proceeds which are non-probate assets. Clearly the grandchildren are better off having been named as primary beneficiaries of the policies and receiving the proceeds directly rather than through the estate. This group also benefits from the absence of statutory authority that would permit the fiduciary from pursuing non-probate assets.
Whether the IRS will refuse to compromise the tax bill and whether it will push the administrator to clawback funds from the trusts will be the next installment. The government has its own statutory authority to collect taxes from transferees, which the court did not address.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Estate of Turco: Is There Clawback For Insufficient Estate Tax Funds?
Author: James F. McDonough
The lack of liquidity is a serious problem in the administration of an Estate, especially for a fiduciary with the potential for personal liability. The lack of liquidity can arise from no planning, illiquid assets or an unforeseen change in circumstances or market conditions. Federal estate tax is due nine months after death; however, it may not be possible to sell assets within that period. The dramatic decline in market values after death or the valuation date creates severe problems as seen below.
The New Jersey case, Estate of Turco, illustrates how adverse market conditions can harm an estate. The decedent died in March 2005 (or six months later with alternate valuation) and the appraisals of the estate produced a $30,000,000 gross estate for federal tax purposes. You may recall the tightening of the credit markets in 2007, followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. The estate is obligated to pay an estate tax calculated on asset values that could not be realized in the current marketplace.
There are two other important facts to note. First, there was $4.5m of life insurance that was paid to trusts for the decedent’s grandchildren, who were designated as the primary beneficiaries of the proceeds. Second, the Will required that all taxes were to be paid from the residuary estate.
The court declared the estate insolvent at the administrator’s request. The administrator requested that he be authorized to clawback funds from the non-probate assets and specific bequests. The Court held that it was too soon to consider clawback and instructed the administrator to seek a compromise with the IRS before requesting such authority.
The court’s opinion noted that the administrator did not have the statutory power under federal or state law to recover taxes from non-probate assets, especially where there is a specific clause in the Will instructing on the source of funds for payment of taxes.
The nightmare for advisors is the rapid decline in asset values without the corresponding liquidity. One must remember the grandchildren’s trust received life insurance proceeds which are non-probate assets. Clearly the grandchildren are better off having been named as primary beneficiaries of the policies and receiving the proceeds directly rather than through the estate. This group also benefits from the absence of statutory authority that would permit the fiduciary from pursuing non-probate assets.
Whether the IRS will refuse to compromise the tax bill and whether it will push the administrator to clawback funds from the trusts will be the next installment. The government has its own statutory authority to collect taxes from transferees, which the court did not address.