
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: July 14, 2020

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is positioning to pick up enforcement efforts in the near future. In March, the EPA issued a temporary policy memorandum suspending enforcement of certain environmental requirements in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the reprieve now has an end date. On June 29, 2020, the EPA issued a memorandum titled, COVID-19 Implications for EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Program: Addendum on Termination, that announced it plans to terminate the temporary enforcement policy on August 31, 2020.
As discussed in a prior article, on March 26, the EPA issued a policy allowing for the agency’s enforcement discretion during the pandemic. To be eligible for enforcement discretion, the EPA policy requires facilities to document decisions made to prevent or mitigate noncompliance and demonstrate how the noncompliance was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the policy, the EPA does not plan to seek penalties for violations of routine compliance monitoring, integrity testing, sampling, laboratory analysis, training, and reporting or certification obligations in situations where the EPA agrees that COVID-19 was the cause of the noncompliance and the entity provides supporting documentation to the EPA upon request.
While the regulated community appreciated that the EPA relaxed its enforcement in response to COVID-19, the policy received significant criticism from environmental groups and certain members of Congress. Critics argued that the EPA had effectively given companies the green light to violate environmental laws. Several states also filed suit, challenging the temporary enforcement policy.
The EPA now plans to end its temporary policy on August 31, 2020. In support, the agency noted that “new federal guidelines and directives have been issued to support both the public health response and economic recovery efforts” and that “[a]s state and local restrictions are relaxed or lifted, so too may the restrictions that potentially impede regulatory compliance, reducing the circumstances in which the temporary policy may apply.”
The EPA’s memo also indicates that it could end the policy sooner than August 31. “In addition, the EPA may terminate this temporary policy (i.e., indicate it does not apply to future noncompliance) on a state or national basis, in whole or in part, at any earlier time, taking into account changing conditions in a state or region of the country, including as appropriate the expiration or lifting of ‘stay at home’ orders in a state, the status of federal and/or state COVID- 19 public health emergency guidelines, and/or other relevant factors or considerations,” the memo states. If the EPA does terminate its temporary policy prior to August 31, either on the national or local level, it will provide prior notification of at least seven days.
Even when the policy is terminated, the EPA may still exercise enforcement discretion on a case-by-case basis. “Nothing herein limits the ability of the EPA to exercise enforcement discretion on a case-by-case basis regarding any noncompliance, including noncompliance caused by the COVID-19 public health emergency, before or after the temporary policy is terminated,” the memo states. “This includes the situation in which a person or entity makes a reasonable attempt to comply with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or other agencies regarding actions suggested to stem the transmission and spread of COVID-19, which the person or entity reasonably deems applicable to its circumstances.”
Key Takeaway Regulated entities should be prepared for the EPA to return to business as usual by August 31, if not sooner. If you have paused any environmental monitoring and reporting activities in response to COVID-19, it is time to start preparing to come back into compliance.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Author: George McGowan

In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Author: George McGowan

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!