Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

NJ Environmental Justice Initiative Leads to Six New Suits

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Date: December 23, 2019

Key Contacts

Back

The NJDEP Recently Announced its Filing of Six New Environmental Enforcement Lawsuits

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently announced that it has filed six new environmental enforcement lawsuits. The suits target sites in Newark, Trenton, East Orange, Kearny, and Camden.

NJ Environmental Justice Initiative Leads to Six New Suits

Environmental Justice Initiative

As detailed in greater depth in prior articles, environmental enforcement has become a top priority for the Murphy Administration. For the first time in a decade, New Jersey filed six new lawsuits seeking to recover natural resource damages (NRD). Last year, the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) and NJDEP also launched a new “environmental justice” initiative designed to address pollution and environmental hazards in minority and lower-income communities across the state.

When it announced the initiative in December 2018, the OAG filed eight environmental justice lawsuits. The Attorney General’s Office also created a new unit to bring additional focus to environmental justice issues. The section, known as the “Environmental Enforcement and Environmental Justice Section,” has repurposed existing resources and hired additional attorneys to bring enforcement actions and promote environmental justice across the state.

Latest Enforcement Suits

On October 25, 2019, Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal and NJDEP Commissioner Catherine R. McCabe announced the filing of six new enforcement actions targeting alleged polluters in minority and lower-income communities across New Jersey:

  • 461-491 Fourth Street in Newark (site of the Nanes Metal Finishing Company);
  • 723-725 Chestnut Street in Trenton (site of Sainte Marie Dry Cleaners);
  • 1474 West State Street in Trenton (site of Schofield Cleaners);
  • 260-268 Chestnut Street in Camden (site of significant illegal dumping);
  • 34-38 Stover Avenue in Kearny (site of Auto Scrap); and
  • 66-68 North Park Street in East Orange (site of Gas Mart).

“Today’s six enforcement actions are just the latest salvo in our ongoing efforts to stand up for environmental justice and to fight for communities across the state that have been ignored in the past,” said Attorney General Grewal. “Our message to polluters is once again clear: you cannot pollute the state’s air, water, or land and get away with it under our watch. No matter whether a company is releasing hazardous substances into the soil or an individual is maintaining an illegal dump in a residential neighborhood, we will take them to court. That is the kind of environmental commitment that all of our communities deserve.”

Environmental Crimes Handbook

Attorney General Grewal also announced the publication of an Environmental Crimes Handbook, which is a guide for the state’s law enforcement personnel. In his accompanying letter to law enforcement, Grewal highlighted that a range of laws already exist that empower law enforcement officers to investigate, arrest, and prosecute individuals and companies that cause environmental harm. The manual aims to “empower law enforcement officers across the state to understand the range of environmental crimes.”  It includes a summary of the elements and penalties of all the most common and widely applicable environmental laws. To further support enforcement, the Environmental Crimes Unit is also developing training to provide to state and local investigators and prosecutors to help address environmental crimes.

Key Takeaway

The six new suits confirm that addressing contamination in minority and lower-income communities remains a top priority for the Murphy Administration. Property owners and others who may be responsible for pollution and other environmental hazards in such communities should be prepared for increased scrutiny. Given that the costs of remediation and related enforcement penalties, businesses should also be proactive and contact an experienced environmental law attorney with any concerns.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!