
Donald M. Pepe
Partner
732-568-8370 dpepe@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Date: June 6, 2019

Partner
732-568-8370 dpepe@sh-law.comJersey City is currently considering the adoption of an inclusionary zone ordinance, which would require developers to build new affordable housing units as part of new residential projects. The mandatory affordable-housing set aside would specifically apply to all properties/developments with a residential component that are requesting an additional 5 units or 5,000 square feet of additional residential floor area, whichever is less, beyond the permitted existing zoning through a variance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(C), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(D), or a Redevelopment Plan Amendment.

As detailed more fully in a prior post, the proposed inclusionary zoning ordinance mandates that applicable developments set aside not less than 20% of the total number (permitted plus additional) of residential units as affordable housing. However, it provides exemptions for developments of 30 units or less; any project which is to be undertaken by the Jersey City Housing Authority; and rezoning initiated by the City as a result of a Master Plan Update or Amendment. The required affordable housing units must be built on-site and integrated with the market rate units unless an exemption is granted. The various options are detailed below.
Under the ordinance, the city may permit the creation of off-site affordable units for some or all the obligation provided the following conditions are satisfied:
At the discretion of the approving authority, developers can also make a voluntary cash payment into the City of Jersey City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund in lieu of constructing all or part of the affordable housing units required by the ordinance. However, it is important to highlight that the ordinance expressly states that Jersey City favors construction of on-site affordable units and that “[t]he opportunity to provide a payment in lieu of constructing on-site affordable housing units is not intended to be and should not be construed as a right available to developers at their sole option.”
To be eligible to make a payment in lieu of building affordable housing, the applicant must demonstrate to the approving authority that the development of on-site affordable units is not feasible or not needed. The proposed ordinance provides that the approving authority should consider the following metrics when determining if an application should be allowed to use the payment in lieu option:
The above list is not exhaustive, and the consideration of other relevant factors is permissible. The amount of the payment-in-lieu figure will be based upon a tiered payment-in-lieu system that will increase 2% every year. The boundaries of the tiered areas will be established on the map entitled “INCLUSIONARY ZONING: Payment in Lieu of Creating Affordable Housing.” The requirements for each tier are:
The approval of any payment in lieu benefit is conditioned upon the developer and the City entering into a developer’s agreement that details the manner in which the contribution will be fulfilled.
A reduction in the mandatory on-site affordable housing requirement may also be considered relative to the value of community benefits proposed by the developer. Under the proposed inclusionary zoning ordinance, the City of Jersey City will only accept community benefits in the case of a redevelopment plan amendment and acceptance will be at the discretion of the Mayor or their designee, the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency, and the City Council.
Eligible community benefits may consist of, but are not limited to, the following: construction of a public facility, such as, but not limited to, public schools, public recreational facilities, government offices, fire stations, police stations, public parking garages, public transportation systems or facilities, roads and water infrastructure, etc. The approval of any community benefit is conditioned upon the developer and the City entering into a redevelopment agreement that details the manner in which the contribution will be fulfilled.
The members of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Land Use group often provide advice and guidance regarding development and redevelopment within the requirements of Jersey City’s ever-changing zoning regulations. We will continue to track the progress of the proposed ordinance and provide updates as they become available.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Donald M. Pepe, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!