
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comIn the meantime, BP has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans to keep the payment of some claims on hold while it appeals the claims process, arguing it could be irreparably harmed if forced to pay before the dispute is resolved.

By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on March 3rd upheld the U.S. District Court ruling that the settlement’s terms meant even unharmed plaintiffs could receive money. The Courts believed BP knew as much when it agreed to the deal in order to avoid having to litigate each case individually.
After that ruling, BP requested a rehearing by the full appeals court on whether parties must show the spill caused their losses. BP is seeking to avoid paying what it claims would be billions of dollars in unjustified claims. The Fifth Circuit court voted 8-5 against the rehearing. The Court reasoned that the settlement agreement provides the payment of claims is based on a formula, primarily depending on the claimant’s distance from the spill, and BP assented to the terms of the agreement.
BP released a statement announcing its intention to appeal the court order which would result in the company paying claims with no connection to the spill. “No company would agree to pay for losses that it did not cause, and BP certainly did not when it entered into this settlement,” BP said.
In 2012, BP settled with most of the private-party plaintiffs. The initial estimate of the cost of the agreement was $7.8 billion. BP is alleging the claims administrator has improperly interpreted the settlement which has raised the settlement price to $9.2 billion or more.
The appeal is In Re Deepwater Horizon, 13-30095, 13-30315, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (New Orleans). The lower court case is In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010, 10-md-02179, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!