If you’ve been keeping up with the latest sports law, you’ve probably heard Texas A&M Defensive Coordinator John Chavis will face a jury of his peers regarding his alleged breach of contract with Louisiana State University.
The Advocate reported Baton Rouge District Judge Tim Kelley recently concluded a jury will decide whether Chavis or LSU breached the former’s contract. The judge’s decision is the latest development in a high-profile sports lawsuit that’s been going on since early 2015.
Background of the LSU and Chavis case
Chavis is, according to Saturday Down South, one of the most reputable DCs in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Southeastern Conference. He served as DC for the Tennessee Volunteers (1995-2008) and the LSU Tigers (2009-2014). Now, he’s a DC and linebackers coach for the Texas A&M Aggies. During his time at LSU, analysts consistently ranked the team’s defense in the top 10 across the nation.
What’s going on with the lawsuit? SB Nation provided a rundown of the case. On Jan. 5, 2015, Chavis submitted his 30-day notice to LSU in the wake of rumors speculating the DC was to leave the Baton Rouge-based school for a position at Texas A&M. According to CBS Sports, Chavis’ LSU contract expired on Dec. 31, 2015. However, Chavis maintained the contract contained the following conditions which allowed him to legally terminate the agreement before the end of last year:
Chavis could terminate the deal without cause provided he submitted an official 30-day notice.
If there were 11 months left on his contract or fewer, the DC could terminate the agreement without having to pay a penalty.
Here’s where things get a little messy. SB Nation noted that, on Jan. 15 of last year, a picture surfaced showing Chavis dawning Texas A&M gear while on an alleged recruiting visit with Kris Boyd, a corner back now playing for the University of Texas. The photo implies that Chavis was working for his current school before the 30-day notice period expired on Feb. 4. From LSU’s perspective, recruitment is a part of a coach’s job, and therefore, Chavis broke the contract’s agreement.
Lawsuits on both sides
KBTX.com reported that, before Chavis allegedly visited Boyd in an attempt to recruit him, LSU Director of Athletics Joe Alleva sent the DC a letter claiming the latter must pay the university $400,000. This was before Texas A&M officially hired Chavis. This prompted Chavis to file a suit claiming not only that he didn’t have to pay the penalty but also that Texas A&M was responsible for paying the fee if that was the case.
Last year, a Texas judge dismissed the lawsuit, asserting the case belonged in a Louisiana district, according to Alabama.com. One of the recent arguments against Chavis’ suit is that he did not break the contract because he did not sign an amended contract during his tenure at LSU. However, the DC’s old school is still pursuing the case.
Jill Craft, Chavis’ lead attorney, argued the $400,000 buyout Chavis owes the school is void because the school altered the contract in 2013. In her words, “[Chavis] didn’t breach it because he didn’t sign it.” However, Kelley maintained the lawsuit will go to jury in any case. As of the end of October, Kelley has not set a date for the jury trial.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association contracts are quite complex, requiring thorough analysis from experienced attorneys. If you’re in the midst of negotiating a contract with your university or have any questions regarding the matter, please contact me, Anthony Caruso, 201-806-3364.
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect
A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease
A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
