Unbeknownst to many, however, the rights to the song actually belong to Warner/Chappell Music Inc., the publishing arm of Warner Music Group, and the group maintains sole rights to the song’s reproduction, distribution, and public performances. A new lawsuit brought against the company seeks to change that and make the popular tune public domain.
Good Morning to You Productions Corp., a New York-based company that is making a documentary about the song, recently brought a lawsuit against Warner/Chappell Music, after being required to pay Warner/Chappell $1,500 for a license to use the song. Companies that fail to pay licensing fees and use the song without Warner/Chappell’s permission face penalties as high as $150,000. Reuters reports that the company has collected more than $2 million in licensing fees for use of the tune.
The 120-year-old song was originally entitled “Good Morning to All” by Mildred J. Hill and Patty Smith Hill. The initial lyrics read “Good morning to you / Good morning to you / Good morning dear children / Good morning to all,” but were eventually changed into the popular “Happy Birthday” tune known today.
While the exact details of the lawsuit have not been released, the plaintiff is suing for “millions of dollars of unlawful licensing fees”, the proceeds of which are to be distributed to thousands of individuals and companies that have been required to pay for the song, according to Reuters. The group said that the company cannot rightly hold the rights to the 1893 song under current entertainment law.
“More than 120 years after the melody to which the simple lyrics of ‘Happy Birthday to You’ is set was first published, defendant Warner/Chappell boldly, but wrongfully and unlawfully, insists that it owns the copyright to ‘Happy Birthday to You,'” the lawsuit said, Reuters reports.
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
