Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 11, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhile the 2016 free agency period doesn’t begin for another few months, the NFL regular season is over and as teams that missed the playoffs consider their futures, players should also begin thinking about how they would like to continue with their careers.
As the playoffs proceed and certain players on all 32 teams face some sort of free agency period ahead, they should speak with their agents and consider whether they would like to stay where they are or move on to a new team next season.
The end of every NFL season brings with it a new group of free agents, many of whom begin to question the next step in their careers. What their next move might be is a consideration colored both by the amount of time they’ve spent in the league and which teams they hope will sign them. Depending how many seasons players have accrued they may be either restricted or unrestricted free agents. Whether they are categorized as the former or the latter will have an influence on how they proceed with their careers.
“Many free agents face questions about their futures.”
Restricted free agents are waning in the league, though they are not bound for extinction. These players’ situations are less fluid than that of unrestricted free agents, and depend more on whether their old teams would prefer to resign them or let them test the market. However, these free agents are also becoming less common with each passing year. This is due to season accrual requirements that determine whether a free agent is restricted or unrestricted.
A restricted free agent is a player who has accrued three full seasons, but less than four. An accrued season is one in which the individual is on the team’s 53-man roster for at least six games. The reason restricted free agents are becoming harder to find is due to the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement rookie contracts which were extended to four seasons. That means that players drafted since then skip over the restricted free agency threshold and move straight to unrestricted free agency by the time their contracts are up. Undrafted players or those who are cut before their first four seasons are up may eventually become restricted free agents, but the same is no longer true for individuals who make it all the way through their rookie contracts with one team.
Those who do become restricted free agents can sign with any team starting March 15. From that date, any team may tender an offer to the player, but his old team may counter with a qualifying offer. The previous club also has the right of first refusal on any contract terms. If the player does sign with a new team, his old organization may be entitled to draft compensation.
New York Giants’ cornerback Prince Amukamara, slated to be an unrestricted free agent, is one player who will have to ponder where he wants to play next year.
The rest of the individuals who enter free agency this year will be unrestricted. These individuals may start speaking with other teams starting March 12, though they may not officially accept an offer until free agency begins on March 15. Unrestricted free agents may negotiate with and receive offers from any team, and their previous organizations do not have the right to refuse these deals. Old clubs are not entitled to draft compensation, either, if the individual chooses to sign with a new team. If an unrestricted free agent goes unsigned through the start of training camp, his old team may acquire negotiating rights by offering a 1-year contract for 110 percent of his previous salary.
Players who are facing free agency starting in March have to eventually make a decision about how they would like to proceed with their careers. What they choose largely depends on their free agency status.
For more information on how free agency status may impact a player’s career come March, speak with an experienced sports law attorney or NFL agent for advice on potential options.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!