Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Employers, Employees Still Confused Over DOMA Rules
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 2, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Nearly two months after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, employers and employees alike are still confused about how the court’s decree will affect them.
Employee Benefit News recently reported that many employers are unsure about whether they need to change their policies for same-sex couples immediately, and which policies need to be altered. Employees have some confusion as well about whether the Internal Revenue Service will consider where same-sex couples live when making benefit determinations or where they were married. This question could have large implications on health insurance costs.
For instance, Kaiser Health News recently noted that some employers offered health insurance to same-sex couples prior to the DOMA strike down. In these cases, employees who utilized this health insurance benefit were required to pay federal income tax on the value of that coverage, which is considered imputed income. Following the court’s ruling, same-sex couples who live in states that allow marriage will no longer be required to pay this income. However, the issue gets more complex for couples who live outside these states.
“If the IRS decides to follow its standard practice and recognize marriages based on where a couple lives, these couples could still be responsible for paying income tax on the value of a spouse’s health insurance,” the analysis read. “But if the IRS goes with the place of celebration standard, couples living in states that don’t recognize their marriages could avoid paying federal income tax on the spouse’s health insurance.”
Non-health related financial issues are also up in the air, with employers confused about whether they must provide benefits to same-sex workers retroactively. Couples are also on the fence about whether they can legally seek out refunds from prior returns if it falls within the three-year statute of limitations for amending returns. As these tax law issues remain unresolved, employers are being urged to seek legal advice and proceed with caution.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Commercial Real Estate Trends to Watch in 2026
Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner
One Big Beautiful Bill: New Tip Income Tax Rules Employers & Workers Need to Know
Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
One Big Beautiful Bill: New Overtime Tax Rules Employers and Employees Need to Know
Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
New York’s FAIR Business Practices Act: What the New Consumer Protection Measure Means for Your Business
In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
How to Reduce Legal Risk as Your New Jersey Business Grows in 2026
For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
Crypto Investor Protection: SEC and CFTC Enforcement Trends
Crypto investor protection continues to evolve, with the SEC and CFTC investing resources and coordinating more closely to uphold regulatory standards. Whether you’re a retail investor, an institutional trader, or part of a crypto startup, understanding enforcement trends is essential for navigating this dynamic and high-stakes regulatory environment. Crypto Is No Longer the Wild West […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.