Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 15, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Department of Education has released guidance which sets forth the following minimum requirements:
Source: The Road Back, NJ DOE, pg. 25
Screening Method | Do we recommend this? | Rationale |
Temperature Checks | No. | NJ DOE Guidance permits, but does not require Confidentiality and privacy concerns Logistical concerns |
Mandatory Testing | No. |
We are currently advising against implementing temperature checks as a screening method due to practical and legal concerns. If your district elects to proceed with temperature screening, a variety of legal issues may arise including, but not limited to, the confidentiality of employee health data and adherence to social distancing protocols.
Please comply with the CDC COVID-19 Workplace Guidelines which lay out procedures for both:
While we recommend against adopting a policy requiring employee temperature checks due to the concerns noted above, such measures are a valid and acceptable method for employee screening. Should Districts elect to adopt such a policy, it is imperative that employee confidentiality be maintained. Employees’ temperatures should not be announced or seen by anyone other than the individual(s) authorized to conduct the screening. Employees’ temperatures are medical records and should be kept separately from personnel files.
Any District employee selected to conduct temperature screenings of other employees should be provided with training regarding the proper handling and maintenance of confidential medical information.
If the District elects to utilize a third-party vendor to perform temperature screenings, including mobile applications which allow employees to self-screen, please be aware that issues may arise due to the vendor’s policies with respect to maintaining and sharing employee data. It is recommended that a thorough review of all vendor agreements and applicable policies be conducted before a vendor is selected.
If a District elects not to implement temperature screenings, employees may instead be required to answer questions regarding their current health status and provide updated responses as needed. Screening forms should require the employee to respond to the following:
Employees should be advised that they are required to report a change in the response to any of the questions noted above which may then result in a requirement that they quarantine for a period of 14 days and/or submit to COVID-19 testing.
May districts require that staff get tested for COVID-19?
Yes. Per the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s guidelines, Districts may require that staff get tested so long as requiring the test is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Given the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 poses a direct threat to the health of others in the workplace, therefore, requiring a test is job-related and consistent with business necessity.
While it is not recommended that employees generally be required to submit to testing prior to returning to work, it is recommended that employees submit to such testing in the following circumstances:
Please be advised that employers may not require employees to take antibody tests before returning to work under any circumstances.
May Districts require employees to wear masks for the entire workday?
Yes. “Schools and districts must allow for social distancing to the maximum extent possible. When social distancing is difficult or impossible, face coverings are required, and face coverings are always required for visitors and staff unless it will inhibit the individual’s health. School districts must also minimize use of shared objects, ensure indoor facilities have adequate ventilation, prepare and maintain hand sanitizing stations, and ensure students wash hands frequently.” The Road Back: Restart and Recovery Plan for Education, NJ Department of Education, June 2020.
One of the very few explicit requirements included by the Department of Education in the reopening guidance is the requirement that all staff wear face coverings, unless prevented from doing so as a result of a health condition. If an employee claims a medical exemption to the face-covering requirement, the employee should be required to submit a medical certification attesting to the specific medical condition and diagnosis that makes compliance a health risk.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Sarah Gober, Caitlin Dettmer, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, like all M&A transactions, it is important to understand the legal nuances and proper due diligence in mergers and acquisitions. What Is a Short Form […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Breach of contract disputes are the most common type of business litigation. Therefore, nearly all New York and New Jersey businesses will likely have to deal with a contract dispute at least once. Understanding when to file a breach of contract lawsuit and how long you have to sue for breach of contract is essential […]
Author: Brittany P. Tarabour
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!