Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 15, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Department of Education has released guidance which sets forth the following minimum requirements:
Source: The Road Back, NJ DOE, pg. 25
Screening Method | Do we recommend this? | Rationale |
Temperature Checks | No. | NJ DOE Guidance permits, but does not require Confidentiality and privacy concerns Logistical concerns |
Mandatory Testing | No. |
We are currently advising against implementing temperature checks as a screening method due to practical and legal concerns. If your district elects to proceed with temperature screening, a variety of legal issues may arise including, but not limited to, the confidentiality of employee health data and adherence to social distancing protocols.
Please comply with the CDC COVID-19 Workplace Guidelines which lay out procedures for both:
While we recommend against adopting a policy requiring employee temperature checks due to the concerns noted above, such measures are a valid and acceptable method for employee screening. Should Districts elect to adopt such a policy, it is imperative that employee confidentiality be maintained. Employees’ temperatures should not be announced or seen by anyone other than the individual(s) authorized to conduct the screening. Employees’ temperatures are medical records and should be kept separately from personnel files.
Any District employee selected to conduct temperature screenings of other employees should be provided with training regarding the proper handling and maintenance of confidential medical information.
If the District elects to utilize a third-party vendor to perform temperature screenings, including mobile applications which allow employees to self-screen, please be aware that issues may arise due to the vendor’s policies with respect to maintaining and sharing employee data. It is recommended that a thorough review of all vendor agreements and applicable policies be conducted before a vendor is selected.
If a District elects not to implement temperature screenings, employees may instead be required to answer questions regarding their current health status and provide updated responses as needed. Screening forms should require the employee to respond to the following:
Employees should be advised that they are required to report a change in the response to any of the questions noted above which may then result in a requirement that they quarantine for a period of 14 days and/or submit to COVID-19 testing.
May districts require that staff get tested for COVID-19?
Yes. Per the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s guidelines, Districts may require that staff get tested so long as requiring the test is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Given the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 poses a direct threat to the health of others in the workplace, therefore, requiring a test is job-related and consistent with business necessity.
While it is not recommended that employees generally be required to submit to testing prior to returning to work, it is recommended that employees submit to such testing in the following circumstances:
Please be advised that employers may not require employees to take antibody tests before returning to work under any circumstances.
May Districts require employees to wear masks for the entire workday?
Yes. “Schools and districts must allow for social distancing to the maximum extent possible. When social distancing is difficult or impossible, face coverings are required, and face coverings are always required for visitors and staff unless it will inhibit the individual’s health. School districts must also minimize use of shared objects, ensure indoor facilities have adequate ventilation, prepare and maintain hand sanitizing stations, and ensure students wash hands frequently.” The Road Back: Restart and Recovery Plan for Education, NJ Department of Education, June 2020.
One of the very few explicit requirements included by the Department of Education in the reopening guidance is the requirement that all staff wear face coverings, unless prevented from doing so as a result of a health condition. If an employee claims a medical exemption to the face-covering requirement, the employee should be required to submit a medical certification attesting to the specific medical condition and diagnosis that makes compliance a health risk.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Sarah Gober, Caitlin Dettmer, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!