Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 15, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
The New Jersey Department of Education has released guidance which sets forth the following minimum requirements:
Source: The Road Back, NJ DOE, pg. 25
| Screening Method | Do we recommend this? | Rationale |
| Temperature Checks | No. | NJ DOE Guidance permits, but does not require Confidentiality and privacy concerns Logistical concerns |
| Mandatory Testing | No. |
We are currently advising against implementing temperature checks as a screening method due to practical and legal concerns. If your district elects to proceed with temperature screening, a variety of legal issues may arise including, but not limited to, the confidentiality of employee health data and adherence to social distancing protocols.
Please comply with the CDC COVID-19 Workplace Guidelines which lay out procedures for both:
While we recommend against adopting a policy requiring employee temperature checks due to the concerns noted above, such measures are a valid and acceptable method for employee screening. Should Districts elect to adopt such a policy, it is imperative that employee confidentiality be maintained. Employees’ temperatures should not be announced or seen by anyone other than the individual(s) authorized to conduct the screening. Employees’ temperatures are medical records and should be kept separately from personnel files.
Any District employee selected to conduct temperature screenings of other employees should be provided with training regarding the proper handling and maintenance of confidential medical information.
If the District elects to utilize a third-party vendor to perform temperature screenings, including mobile applications which allow employees to self-screen, please be aware that issues may arise due to the vendor’s policies with respect to maintaining and sharing employee data. It is recommended that a thorough review of all vendor agreements and applicable policies be conducted before a vendor is selected.
If a District elects not to implement temperature screenings, employees may instead be required to answer questions regarding their current health status and provide updated responses as needed. Screening forms should require the employee to respond to the following:
Employees should be advised that they are required to report a change in the response to any of the questions noted above which may then result in a requirement that they quarantine for a period of 14 days and/or submit to COVID-19 testing.
May districts require that staff get tested for COVID-19?
Yes. Per the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s guidelines, Districts may require that staff get tested so long as requiring the test is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Given the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 poses a direct threat to the health of others in the workplace, therefore, requiring a test is job-related and consistent with business necessity.
While it is not recommended that employees generally be required to submit to testing prior to returning to work, it is recommended that employees submit to such testing in the following circumstances:
Please be advised that employers may not require employees to take antibody tests before returning to work under any circumstances.
May Districts require employees to wear masks for the entire workday?
Yes. “Schools and districts must allow for social distancing to the maximum extent possible. When social distancing is difficult or impossible, face coverings are required, and face coverings are always required for visitors and staff unless it will inhibit the individual’s health. School districts must also minimize use of shared objects, ensure indoor facilities have adequate ventilation, prepare and maintain hand sanitizing stations, and ensure students wash hands frequently.” The Road Back: Restart and Recovery Plan for Education, NJ Department of Education, June 2020.
One of the very few explicit requirements included by the Department of Education in the reopening guidance is the requirement that all staff wear face coverings, unless prevented from doing so as a result of a health condition. If an employee claims a medical exemption to the face-covering requirement, the employee should be required to submit a medical certification attesting to the specific medical condition and diagnosis that makes compliance a health risk.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Sarah Gober, Caitlin Dettmer, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!