Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 13, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently issued new Enforcement Guidance regarding pregnancy discrimination, marking the agency’s first official update since 1983. The guidance addresses compliance under both the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) and the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), both of which apply to employers with 15 or more employees. New Jersey employers should remember that New Jersey also recently amended its Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) in a similar fashion which will require compliance by all New Jersey employers without regard to the number of persons employed
.
The PDA requires employers to treat women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions in the same manner as other applicants or employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work. The PDA covers all aspects of employment, including firing, hiring, promotions, and fringe benefits (such as leave and health insurance benefits).
The EEOC advises that since lactation is a medical condition related to pregnancy, employers may not discriminate against an employee because of her breastfeeding schedule. The guidance also states that an employer may not treat pregnant workers differently from employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work based on the cause of their limitations. “For example, an employer may not deny light duty to a pregnant employee based on a policy that limits light duty to employees with on-the-job injuries,” the EEOC explains.
New Jersey has taken this even further. It requires that employers accommodate pregnant employees even when they cannot perform the essential functions of their job. This is a major departure from traditional disability legal concepts.
Pregnancy is not expressly considered a disability under the ADA. However, the EEOC makes it clear that employees with pregnancy-related impairments may be entitled to reasonable accommodations, so long as their condition substantially limits their ability to perform one or more major life activities. Examples provided by the agency include pregnancy-related carpal tunnel syndrome, gestational diabetes, pregnancy-related sciatica, and preeclampsia
According to the guidance, accommodation of pregnancy-related disabilities “might include allowing a pregnant worker to take more frequent breaks, to keep a water bottle at a work station, or to use a stool, altering how job functions are performed; or providing a temporary assignment to a light duty position.”
The EEOC’s guidance represents the agency’s view of what employers should do to avoid pregnancy discrimination claims. While the best practices prescribed may not be binding law, they should also not be taken lightly as they will form the basis for the agency’s enforcement efforts. The cost of arguing the limits of the EEOC’s powers under the Administrative Procedures Act in federal court should be weighed carefully.
For more definitive answers regarding the type of accommodation employers are required to provide pregnant workers, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. next term. We will preview the case in the coming weeks, so please check back for updates.
If you have questions about the EEOC pregnancy discrimination guidance or want to ensure that your business is in compliance, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently issued new Enforcement Guidance regarding pregnancy discrimination, marking the agency’s first official update since 1983. The guidance addresses compliance under both the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) and the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), both of which apply to employers with 15 or more employees. New Jersey employers should remember that New Jersey also recently amended its Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) in a similar fashion which will require compliance by all New Jersey employers without regard to the number of persons employed
.
The PDA requires employers to treat women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions in the same manner as other applicants or employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work. The PDA covers all aspects of employment, including firing, hiring, promotions, and fringe benefits (such as leave and health insurance benefits).
The EEOC advises that since lactation is a medical condition related to pregnancy, employers may not discriminate against an employee because of her breastfeeding schedule. The guidance also states that an employer may not treat pregnant workers differently from employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work based on the cause of their limitations. “For example, an employer may not deny light duty to a pregnant employee based on a policy that limits light duty to employees with on-the-job injuries,” the EEOC explains.
New Jersey has taken this even further. It requires that employers accommodate pregnant employees even when they cannot perform the essential functions of their job. This is a major departure from traditional disability legal concepts.
Pregnancy is not expressly considered a disability under the ADA. However, the EEOC makes it clear that employees with pregnancy-related impairments may be entitled to reasonable accommodations, so long as their condition substantially limits their ability to perform one or more major life activities. Examples provided by the agency include pregnancy-related carpal tunnel syndrome, gestational diabetes, pregnancy-related sciatica, and preeclampsia
According to the guidance, accommodation of pregnancy-related disabilities “might include allowing a pregnant worker to take more frequent breaks, to keep a water bottle at a work station, or to use a stool, altering how job functions are performed; or providing a temporary assignment to a light duty position.”
The EEOC’s guidance represents the agency’s view of what employers should do to avoid pregnancy discrimination claims. While the best practices prescribed may not be binding law, they should also not be taken lightly as they will form the basis for the agency’s enforcement efforts. The cost of arguing the limits of the EEOC’s powers under the Administrative Procedures Act in federal court should be weighed carefully.
For more definitive answers regarding the type of accommodation employers are required to provide pregnant workers, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. next term. We will preview the case in the coming weeks, so please check back for updates.
If you have questions about the EEOC pregnancy discrimination guidance or want to ensure that your business is in compliance, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!