
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: March 26, 2014
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFailing to make a reasonable religious accommodation to your dress and grooming policy can be costly. Just ask United Galaxy Inc., a car dealership in Little Falls, New Jersey. Late last year, the company agreed to pay $50,000 to resolve allegations that it declined to hire a Sikh applicant after he refused to shave his beard for religious reasons.
In total, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’ received 3,721 charges alleging religious discrimination in FY 2013. The agency has further indicated that such cases are a growing priority.
To avoid running afoul of federal employment law, employers should carefully read the EEOC’s latest guidance on how Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to religious dress and grooming practices, and what steps employers can take to meet their legal responsibilities in this area.
Employers must generally make exceptions to their usual policies or preferences to allow applicants and employees to observe religious dress and grooming practices, unless doing so presents an undue hardship. As detailed by the EEOC, examples of religious dress and grooming practices include:
To further illustrate when employers must make religious accommodations, the guidance includes 16 questions and answers, along with illustrative examples. Key topics that are addressed include: determining whether an asserted religious practice is sincerely held; assigning an employee to a non-customer contact position; addressing workplace safety, security, or health concerns; and preventing retaliation. We encourage all employers to review the examples and contact an experienced labor attorney with any concerns.
If you have any questions about religious discrimination claims or would like to discuss your company’s employee policies and procedures, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment Law attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!