![Dan Brecher](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fres.cloudinary.com%2Fscarinci-hollenbeck%2Fimages%2Ff_auto%2Cq_auto%2Fv1636806409%2Fwp.scarincihollenbeck%2FDanBrecher-Profile-743x795-1%2FDanBrecher-Profile-743x795-1.jpg%3F_i%3DAA&w=256&q=75)
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comAuthor: Dan Brecher|March 26, 2014
Failing to make a reasonable religious accommodation to your dress and grooming policy can be costly. Just ask United Galaxy Inc., a car dealership in Little Falls, New Jersey. Late last year, the company agreed to pay $50,000 to resolve allegations that it declined to hire a Sikh applicant after he refused to shave his beard for religious reasons.
In total, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’ received 3,721 charges alleging religious discrimination in FY 2013. The agency has further indicated that such cases are a growing priority.
To avoid running afoul of federal employment law, employers should carefully read the EEOC’s latest guidance on how Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to religious dress and grooming practices, and what steps employers can take to meet their legal responsibilities in this area.
Employers must generally make exceptions to their usual policies or preferences to allow applicants and employees to observe religious dress and grooming practices, unless doing so presents an undue hardship. As detailed by the EEOC, examples of religious dress and grooming practices include:
To further illustrate when employers must make religious accommodations, the guidance includes 16 questions and answers, along with illustrative examples. Key topics that are addressed include: determining whether an asserted religious practice is sincerely held; assigning an employee to a non-customer contact position; addressing workplace safety, security, or health concerns; and preventing retaliation. We encourage all employers to review the examples and contact an experienced labor attorney with any concerns.
If you have any questions about religious discrimination claims or would like to discuss your company’s employee policies and procedures, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment Law attorney with whom you work.
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFailing to make a reasonable religious accommodation to your dress and grooming policy can be costly. Just ask United Galaxy Inc., a car dealership in Little Falls, New Jersey. Late last year, the company agreed to pay $50,000 to resolve allegations that it declined to hire a Sikh applicant after he refused to shave his beard for religious reasons.
In total, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’ received 3,721 charges alleging religious discrimination in FY 2013. The agency has further indicated that such cases are a growing priority.
To avoid running afoul of federal employment law, employers should carefully read the EEOC’s latest guidance on how Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to religious dress and grooming practices, and what steps employers can take to meet their legal responsibilities in this area.
Employers must generally make exceptions to their usual policies or preferences to allow applicants and employees to observe religious dress and grooming practices, unless doing so presents an undue hardship. As detailed by the EEOC, examples of religious dress and grooming practices include:
To further illustrate when employers must make religious accommodations, the guidance includes 16 questions and answers, along with illustrative examples. Key topics that are addressed include: determining whether an asserted religious practice is sincerely held; assigning an employee to a non-customer contact position; addressing workplace safety, security, or health concerns; and preventing retaliation. We encourage all employers to review the examples and contact an experienced labor attorney with any concerns.
If you have any questions about religious discrimination claims or would like to discuss your company’s employee policies and procedures, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment Law attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.