Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 29, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe agency’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) addresses how Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to employee wellness programs.
Many employers have adopted employee wellness programs as a way to lower medicals costs and promote a healthy workforce. Some programs incorporate health risk assessments (e.g., the measurement of body weight and cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure levels) and offer incentives for meeting health-related goals. Other employers simply provide incentives to encourage employees to participate in wellness programs, such as nutrition classes and weight-loss programs.
The EEOC and Congress have been at odds over what has been characterized as “aggressive” financial incentives in wellness programs. On March 24, the House Education and the Workforce Committee held a hearing on a proposed bill that would limit the EEOC’s enforcement activity toward these initiatives—H.R. 1189, the Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act.
This Congressional counter-measure may have prompted the EEOC’s NPRM which clarifies that wellness programs are permitted, but may not be used to discriminate based on disability: “Employers … may not subject employees to interference with their ADA rights, threats, intimidation, or coercion for refusing to participate in a wellness program or for failing to achieve certain health outcomes,” the EEOC press release states. “Individuals with disabilities must be provided with reasonable accommodations that allow them to participate in wellness programs and to earn whatever incentive an employer offers.”
Employee wellness programs must comply with a range of federal laws, including the ADA and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The EEOC’s proposed employee wellness rule clarifies a number of important compliance questions, including: what it means for an employee health program to be voluntary, what incentives employers may offer as part of a voluntary employee health program, and what notice and confidentiality requirements apply to medical information collected under the programs.
Programs must be reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease: In order to meet the standard, the program must have a reasonable chance of improving the health of, or preventing disease in, participating employees, and must not be overly burdensome. A subterfuge for violating the ADA or other laws prohibiting employment discrimination, or highly suspect in the method chosen to promote health or prevent disease.
Programs must be voluntary: Under existing regulations, employee health programs that include disability-related inquiries or medical examinations must be voluntary. The proposed rules clarify that employees may not be required to participate in a wellness program, may not be denied health insurance or given reduced health benefits if they do not participate and may not be disciplined for not participating. In addition, employers must also provide a notice clearly explaining what medical information will be obtained, how the medical information will be used, who will receive the medical information, the restrictions on its disclosure and the methods the covered entity uses to prevent improper disclosure of medical information.
Employers may offer limited incentives to encourage program participation: The amount of the incentive that may be offered for an employee to participate or to achieve health outcomes may not exceed 30 percent of the total cost of employee-only coverage. The EEOC provides the following example: If the total cost of coverage paid by both the employer and employee for self-only coverage is $5,000, the maximum incentive for an employee under that plan is $1,500.
Employers must safeguard all medical information collected: Employers may only receive medical information in aggregate form that does not disclose, and is not reasonably likely to disclose, the identity of specific employees. For wellness programs that are part of a group health plan, the full-range of HIPAA privacy rules apply. Meanwhile, employers that are not considered HIPAA-covered entities may generally comply with the ADA by signing a certification, as provided for by HIPAA regulations, that they will not use or disclose individually identifiable medical information for employment purposes and abiding by that certification.
Employers must make reasonable accommodations: Employers must provide reasonable accommodations that enable employees with disabilities to participate and to earn whatever incentives the employer offers. According to the EEOC, this may include providing a sign language interpreter for a deaf employee who wants to participate in a nutrition class; providing materials related to a wellness program in alternate format, such as large print or Braille, for someone with vision impairment; and providing an alternative to a blood test if an employee’s disability would make drawing blood dangerous.
The EEOC will accept comments on the NPRM until June 19, 2015. We will be closely tracking the status of the proposed rules and encourage readers to check back here for updates.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The agency’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) addresses how Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to employee wellness programs.
Many employers have adopted employee wellness programs as a way to lower medicals costs and promote a healthy workforce. Some programs incorporate health risk assessments (e.g., the measurement of body weight and cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure levels) and offer incentives for meeting health-related goals. Other employers simply provide incentives to encourage employees to participate in wellness programs, such as nutrition classes and weight-loss programs.
The EEOC and Congress have been at odds over what has been characterized as “aggressive” financial incentives in wellness programs. On March 24, the House Education and the Workforce Committee held a hearing on a proposed bill that would limit the EEOC’s enforcement activity toward these initiatives—H.R. 1189, the Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act.
This Congressional counter-measure may have prompted the EEOC’s NPRM which clarifies that wellness programs are permitted, but may not be used to discriminate based on disability: “Employers … may not subject employees to interference with their ADA rights, threats, intimidation, or coercion for refusing to participate in a wellness program or for failing to achieve certain health outcomes,” the EEOC press release states. “Individuals with disabilities must be provided with reasonable accommodations that allow them to participate in wellness programs and to earn whatever incentive an employer offers.”
Employee wellness programs must comply with a range of federal laws, including the ADA and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The EEOC’s proposed employee wellness rule clarifies a number of important compliance questions, including: what it means for an employee health program to be voluntary, what incentives employers may offer as part of a voluntary employee health program, and what notice and confidentiality requirements apply to medical information collected under the programs.
Programs must be reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease: In order to meet the standard, the program must have a reasonable chance of improving the health of, or preventing disease in, participating employees, and must not be overly burdensome. A subterfuge for violating the ADA or other laws prohibiting employment discrimination, or highly suspect in the method chosen to promote health or prevent disease.
Programs must be voluntary: Under existing regulations, employee health programs that include disability-related inquiries or medical examinations must be voluntary. The proposed rules clarify that employees may not be required to participate in a wellness program, may not be denied health insurance or given reduced health benefits if they do not participate and may not be disciplined for not participating. In addition, employers must also provide a notice clearly explaining what medical information will be obtained, how the medical information will be used, who will receive the medical information, the restrictions on its disclosure and the methods the covered entity uses to prevent improper disclosure of medical information.
Employers may offer limited incentives to encourage program participation: The amount of the incentive that may be offered for an employee to participate or to achieve health outcomes may not exceed 30 percent of the total cost of employee-only coverage. The EEOC provides the following example: If the total cost of coverage paid by both the employer and employee for self-only coverage is $5,000, the maximum incentive for an employee under that plan is $1,500.
Employers must safeguard all medical information collected: Employers may only receive medical information in aggregate form that does not disclose, and is not reasonably likely to disclose, the identity of specific employees. For wellness programs that are part of a group health plan, the full-range of HIPAA privacy rules apply. Meanwhile, employers that are not considered HIPAA-covered entities may generally comply with the ADA by signing a certification, as provided for by HIPAA regulations, that they will not use or disclose individually identifiable medical information for employment purposes and abiding by that certification.
Employers must make reasonable accommodations: Employers must provide reasonable accommodations that enable employees with disabilities to participate and to earn whatever incentives the employer offers. According to the EEOC, this may include providing a sign language interpreter for a deaf employee who wants to participate in a nutrition class; providing materials related to a wellness program in alternate format, such as large print or Braille, for someone with vision impairment; and providing an alternative to a blood test if an employee’s disability would make drawing blood dangerous.
The EEOC will accept comments on the NPRM until June 19, 2015. We will be closely tracking the status of the proposed rules and encourage readers to check back here for updates.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!