Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
EEOC Enforcement Report Reveals Significant Drop in Charges
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 13, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
While New Jersey employers should probably keep the champagne on ice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) latest enforcement report is good news. The agency reports that both employment claims and penalties dropped significantly in fiscal year 2014, which ran from Oct. 1, 2013, to Sept. 30, 2014.
In total, the EEOC filed 133 lawsuits on the merits, which represent a slight uptick over last year. However, the agency’s litigation docket remains low. By comparison, the EEOC filed an average of 370 lawsuits a year from 1997 to 2011. Monetary relief from litigation, including settlements, also decreased. Overall, the agency obtained $22.5 million, which represents the lowest payout in more than 15 years.
In recent years, the EEOC has placed greater emphasis on administrative proceedings. However, these recoveries also dropped. The EEOC obtained $296.1 million in total monetary relief through its enforcement program prior to the filing of litigation. In 2013, administrative settlements totaled $372.1 million, while it was $365.4 million in 2012.
In New Jersey, 1,613 charges were filed, which also represents a slight decrease from FY 2013. With regard to the types of charges filed, race, sex, and disability discrimination charges all declined, while retaliation claims continued to increase. Below is a breakdown of the EEOC charges filed in the state, which largely track national data in terms of rankings:
- Retaliation under all statutes: 609 (23.7 percent of all charges filed)
- Race (including racial harassment): 544 (21.2 percent)
- Disability: 416 (16.2 percent)
- Age: 385 (15.0 percent)
- Sex (including pregnancy and sexual harassment): 378 (14.7 percent)
- National origin: 237 (9.2 percent)
According to the EEOC, the government shutdown partially contributed to the dip in charges and penalties, but does not fully explain the downward trend. Of course, the agency reaffirmed its commitment to “strategic enforcement to eliminate barriers to equal employment opportunity.” Accordingly, New Jersey employers should continue to make compliance a top priority, particularly with respect to anti-retaliation policies and procedures.
- Business attorney New Jersey
- Business attorney NYC
- New Jersey Business Litigation Attorney
- New Jersey Employment Attorney
- New Jersey Employment Lawyer
- Practices: Labor & Employment
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.