Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

EEOC Enforcement Report Reveals Significant Drop in Charges

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: February 13, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

While New Jersey employers should probably keep the champagne on ice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) latest enforcement report is good news. The agency reports that both employment claims and penalties dropped significantly in fiscal year 2014, which ran from Oct. 1, 2013, to Sept. 30, 2014.

In total, the EEOC filed 133 lawsuits on the merits, which represent a slight uptick over last year. However, the agency’s litigation docket remains low. By comparison, the EEOC filed an average of 370 lawsuits a year from 1997 to 2011. Monetary relief from litigation, including settlements, also decreased. Overall, the agency obtained $22.5 million, which represents the lowest payout in more than 15 years.

In recent years, the EEOC has placed greater emphasis on administrative proceedings. However, these recoveries also dropped. The EEOC obtained $296.1 million in total monetary relief through its enforcement program prior to the filing of litigation. In 2013, administrative settlements totaled $372.1 million, while it was $365.4 million in 2012.

In New Jersey, 1,613 charges were filed, which also represents a slight decrease from FY 2013. With regard to the types of charges filed, race, sex, and disability discrimination charges all declined, while retaliation claims continued to increase. Below is a breakdown of the EEOC charges filed in the state, which largely track national data in terms of rankings:

  • Retaliation under all statutes: 609 (23.7 percent of all charges filed)
  • Race (including racial harassment): 544 (21.2 percent)
  • Disability: 416 (16.2 percent)
  • Age: 385 (15.0 percent)
  • Sex (including pregnancy and sexual harassment): 378 (14.7 percent)
  • National origin: 237 (9.2 percent)

According to the EEOC, the government shutdown partially contributed to the dip in charges and penalties, but does not fully explain the downward trend. Of course, the agency reaffirmed its commitment to “strategic enforcement to eliminate barriers to equal employment opportunity.” Accordingly, New Jersey employers should continue to make compliance a top priority, particularly with respect to anti-retaliation policies and procedures.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners post image

BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners"
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!