
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 13, 2015

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comIn total, the EEOC filed 133 lawsuits on the merits, which represent a slight uptick over last year. However, the agency’s litigation docket remains low. By comparison, the EEOC filed an average of 370 lawsuits a year from 1997 to 2011. Monetary relief from litigation, including settlements, also decreased. Overall, the agency obtained $22.5 million, which represents the lowest payout in more than 15 years.
In recent years, the EEOC has placed greater emphasis on administrative proceedings. However, these recoveries also dropped. The EEOC obtained $296.1 million in total monetary relief through its enforcement program prior to the filing of litigation. In 2013, administrative settlements totaled $372.1 million, while it was $365.4 million in 2012.
In New Jersey, 1,613 charges were filed, which also represents a slight decrease from FY 2013. With regard to the types of charges filed, race, sex, and disability discrimination charges all declined, while retaliation claims continued to increase. Below is a breakdown of the EEOC charges filed in the state, which largely track national data in terms of rankings:
According to the EEOC, the government shutdown partially contributed to the dip in charges and penalties, but does not fully explain the downward trend. Of course, the agency reaffirmed its commitment to “strategic enforcement to eliminate barriers to equal employment opportunity.” Accordingly, New Jersey employers should continue to make compliance a top priority, particularly with respect to anti-retaliation policies and procedures.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!