
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 2, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comIconic photography pioneer Eastman Kodak said it will seek court approval for a $406 million rights offering upon exit from bankruptcy proceedings that will give creditors a large equity stake in the company.
Many of its key creditors have already agreed to the backstop, which would enable Kodak to issue 34 million common shares at $11.94 each. The amount is the equivalent to roughly 85 percent of the restructured Kodak. The proceeds from the rights offering would be used to repay various second-lien creditors, who would no longer receive equity after the reorganization, according to Reuters. Kodak noted that an official committee of creditors have already shown their support for the rights offering. Creditors that are pushing for the backstop include GSO Capital Partners, BlueMountain Capital, George Karfunkel, United Equities Group, and Contrarian Capital, Reuters reports.
“This agreement, which serves as a critical component of the capital structure for the emerging Kodak, positions us to comprehensively settle our obligations with our various key creditor constituencies,” Kodak chief executive Antonio Perez said in a statement.
In his statement, Perez also noted that Kodak’s ability to participate in this agreement calls attention to its successful restructuring efforts, and suggests the company has a promising future ahead.
The company amended its plan of reorganization and submitted a motion to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York asking it to approve the backstop commitment. A ruling is expected on the matter on June 25.
Kodak filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2012 as a result of rising pension costs and declining profitability as its competitors switched to digital photography platforms. After selling a number of its patents and assets, the company said it hopes to emerge from protection in the third quarter of this year. Upon its emergence from bankruptcy proceedings, Kodak plans to fashion itself as a commercial imaging business.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!