James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Domestic Asset Protection – Why State Legislation Is Not Set In Stone
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 19, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The State of Nevada spent considerable time and effort in crafting its asset protection and dynasty trust statute. Nevada worked hard to attract trust business to the state in an effort to broaden its economic base and decrease its reliance upon tourism and mining. Yet, one amendment to a piece of legislation nearly upset years of work.
Nevada Assembly Bill 378 (Bill 378) acquired an amendment after introduction that would have neutralized Nevada’s ironclad asset protection. Specifically, the amendment would have opened up Nevada trusts to claims of a future class of creditors consisting of spouses, domestic partners and children. Up to now, future creditors had been barred from piercing Nevada trusts to pay judgments.
Although local attorneys, accountants and trust companies responded to defeat Bill 378, this episode points out the pressures that state legislators may be subject to satisfy particular constituencies. The amendment was appended to Bill 378 in response to the urging of certain interest groups. The mere fact that this amendment was accepted is enough to give one pause when choosing an asset protection jurisdiction.
This type of legislation is less likely to be introduced in an offshore jurisdiction because of the economics. These jurisdictions rely heavily on its statutes, reputation and stability to attract trust business. Any threat to a foreign jurisdiction’s trust business would have greater economic impact upon a typically smaller economy heavily that is heavily dependent upon trust and financial business. Foreign trusts, with a flight clause as standard feature, would have fled a foreign jurisdiction before the ink was dry on legislation similar to Bill 378.
The same questions must be asked in selecting a jurisdiction, foreign or domestic. Bill 378 reminds us that we are only a pen stroke away from a reversal of fortune. A trust fleeing one state for another may subject the trust to a new statute of limitations, claims of a fraudulent conveyance and other tax issues. Foreign jurisdictions are less likely to raise issues that would discourage new business.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Domestic Asset Protection – Why State Legislation Is Not Set In Stone
Author: James F. McDonough
The State of Nevada spent considerable time and effort in crafting its asset protection and dynasty trust statute. Nevada worked hard to attract trust business to the state in an effort to broaden its economic base and decrease its reliance upon tourism and mining. Yet, one amendment to a piece of legislation nearly upset years of work.
Nevada Assembly Bill 378 (Bill 378) acquired an amendment after introduction that would have neutralized Nevada’s ironclad asset protection. Specifically, the amendment would have opened up Nevada trusts to claims of a future class of creditors consisting of spouses, domestic partners and children. Up to now, future creditors had been barred from piercing Nevada trusts to pay judgments.
Although local attorneys, accountants and trust companies responded to defeat Bill 378, this episode points out the pressures that state legislators may be subject to satisfy particular constituencies. The amendment was appended to Bill 378 in response to the urging of certain interest groups. The mere fact that this amendment was accepted is enough to give one pause when choosing an asset protection jurisdiction.
This type of legislation is less likely to be introduced in an offshore jurisdiction because of the economics. These jurisdictions rely heavily on its statutes, reputation and stability to attract trust business. Any threat to a foreign jurisdiction’s trust business would have greater economic impact upon a typically smaller economy heavily that is heavily dependent upon trust and financial business. Foreign trusts, with a flight clause as standard feature, would have fled a foreign jurisdiction before the ink was dry on legislation similar to Bill 378.
The same questions must be asked in selecting a jurisdiction, foreign or domestic. Bill 378 reminds us that we are only a pen stroke away from a reversal of fortune. A trust fleeing one state for another may subject the trust to a new statute of limitations, claims of a fraudulent conveyance and other tax issues. Foreign jurisdictions are less likely to raise issues that would discourage new business.