James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Domestic Asset Protection – Why State Legislation Is Not Set In Stone
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 19, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The State of Nevada spent considerable time and effort in crafting its asset protection and dynasty trust statute. Nevada worked hard to attract trust business to the state in an effort to broaden its economic base and decrease its reliance upon tourism and mining. Yet, one amendment to a piece of legislation nearly upset years of work.
Nevada Assembly Bill 378 (Bill 378) acquired an amendment after introduction that would have neutralized Nevada’s ironclad asset protection. Specifically, the amendment would have opened up Nevada trusts to claims of a future class of creditors consisting of spouses, domestic partners and children. Up to now, future creditors had been barred from piercing Nevada trusts to pay judgments.
Although local attorneys, accountants and trust companies responded to defeat Bill 378, this episode points out the pressures that state legislators may be subject to satisfy particular constituencies. The amendment was appended to Bill 378 in response to the urging of certain interest groups. The mere fact that this amendment was accepted is enough to give one pause when choosing an asset protection jurisdiction.
This type of legislation is less likely to be introduced in an offshore jurisdiction because of the economics. These jurisdictions rely heavily on its statutes, reputation and stability to attract trust business. Any threat to a foreign jurisdiction’s trust business would have greater economic impact upon a typically smaller economy heavily that is heavily dependent upon trust and financial business. Foreign trusts, with a flight clause as standard feature, would have fled a foreign jurisdiction before the ink was dry on legislation similar to Bill 378.
The same questions must be asked in selecting a jurisdiction, foreign or domestic. Bill 378 reminds us that we are only a pen stroke away from a reversal of fortune. A trust fleeing one state for another may subject the trust to a new statute of limitations, claims of a fraudulent conveyance and other tax issues. Foreign jurisdictions are less likely to raise issues that would discourage new business.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Corporate Transactions & Business, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Corporate Transactions: Best Practices for Successful Deals
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
How to Conduct a Fair and Legal Employee Termination in 2025
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Admin Dissolution for Annual Report: What You Need to Know
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is Antitrust Litigation Law?
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.