The Department of Labor (DOL) Recently Proposed New Tip Regulations To Allow Tip Pooling Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Last month, the Department of Labor (DOL) proposed new tip regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). If enacted, the new tip pooling rules would provide greater flexibility to restaurant owners and other employers that pay a direct cash wage of least the full federal minimum wage and do not claim a tip credit under the FLSA. The proposed tip regulations would specifically allow employers to create a mandatory tip pool that is not limited to customarily and regularly tipped employees, thereby allowing kitchen staff, dishwashers, and other “back of the house” staff to share in the tips provided to servers.
Under the FLSA, an employer may take a tip credit toward its minimum wage obligation for tipped employees equal to the difference between the required cash wage (at least $2.13) and the federal minimum wage (currently $7.25). To avoid wage issues, employers must be able to show that tipped employees receive at least the minimum wage when direct (or cash) wages and the tip credit amount are combined. If not, the employer must make up the difference.
An employer may take a tip credit under the FLSA only if, among other things, its tipped employees retain all of their tips. The employer taking a tip credit is allowed, however, to implement a tip pool in which tips are shared only among those employees who “customarily and regularly receive tips.” The statute contains no such express restrictions for employers that do not claim a tip credit.
DOL’s 2011 Tip Regulation
In 2011, the DOL issued tip regulations establishing that tips are exclusively the property of the employee. Accordingly, they could not be shared with other non-customarily tipped employees or retained by the employer even if the employee was paid the full minimum wage (as opposed to via a tip credit).
In pronouncing the new rule, the DOL reasoned that “[w]hen the employer uses tips for its own purposes, whether to supplement wage payments to non-tipped employees or to otherwise offset its own business expenses … it is in effect making a deduction from employees’ wages. To this end, the department is not regulating the employer’s use of the tips; it is regulating the employer’s statutory wage payment obligation.”
The DOL rule change sparked several employment lawsuits challenging the DOL’s authority to promulgate the provisions that restrict an employer’s use of tips received by its employees when the employer pays a direct cash wage of at least the federal minimum wage and does not take a tip credit. The federal circuit courts have reached differing conclusions regarding whether the regulation is valid. In recent years, several states have also enacted laws that require employers to pay tipped employees a direct cash wage that is at least the federal minimum wage, which has resulted in fewer employers being able to take the FLSA tip credit.
DOL’s New Proposed Rulemaking
In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the DOL is seeking to rescind the parts of its tip regulations that bar tip-sharing arrangements in establishments where the employers pay full federal minimum wage and do not take a tip credit against their minimum wage obligations. The proposed rule applies only to employers that pay direct cash wages of at least the federal minimum wage and do not take a tip credit. It does not apply to employers who pay less than the federal minimum wage and take a tip credit.
“This would likely increase the earnings of those employees who are newly added to the tip pool and further incentivize them to provide good customer service,” the DOL maintains. “The proposed rule would additionally provide employers greater flexibility in determining pay practices for tipped and non-tipped workers. It also may allow for a reduction in wage disparities among employees who all contribute to the customers’ experience.”
Not surprisingly, the DOL is receiving a lot of feedback on the proposed rule. In response, the agency recently extended the deadline for submitting comments to February 5, 2018. Restaurant owners have overwhelmingly voiced support for the rule, citing that it will give them the flexibility to address inequities in pay between the so-called back and front of the house. Meanwhile, critics of the proposed rule maintain that server tips shouldn’t be used to subsidize higher wages for kitchen staff.
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders
Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer
A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]
Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know
When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Zoning Laws Explained: What You Need to Know Before Buying Property
Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Special Needs Trusts in New Jersey: Planning for Your Loved One’s Future
For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
