
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: January 17, 2013

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comIf you subscribe to Netflix, you know that DVDs appear in your mailbox at seemingly warp speed. While consumers certainly appreciate the prompt delivery, at least one other mail-order business believes Netflix is receiving an unfair business advantage from the U.S. Postal Service.
In 2011, GameFly Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Postal Regulatory Commission, alleging that it was providing Netflix with special treatment by removing its DVDs from the automated letter stream and manually sorting them. GameFly further noted that the Postal Service provides the service to Netflix free of charge.
GameFly, which rents video games to customers via the U.S. mail, asked the Postal Service to provide a similar accommodation because the automated sorting equipment tends to damages the discs. After the Postal Service refused, GameFly was forced to use a cardboard insert to protect the DVDs and mail them as First-Class “flats”—a more expensive rate category intended for larger envelopes. Because Netflix was able to avoid these added costs, GameFly’s lawsuit alleged that Postal Service had discriminated against the company in rates and terms of service.
Most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia sided with GameFly, holding that the Postal Regulatory Commission’s practices were discriminatory and that prior efforts to cure the discrimination have fallen short. It ordered the Commission to remedy all discrimination against the company or provide a reasonable explanation for providing Netflix preferential treatment.
“The Postal Service has saved Netflix — apparently its biggest DVD mailer customer — from this crippling otherwise industry wide problem by diverting Netflix mail from the automated letter stream, shifting it to specially designated trays and containers, hand culling it and hand processing it,” U.S. Circuit Judge David Sentelle wrote in the opinion. “Rather obviously, this is not without cost to the Postal Service.”
Unless the Commission can explain why it left discrimination in place, it must order new remedies that place the companies on equal footing. Therefore, it is likely that changes could be on the way for Netflix and other companies that rent DVDs through the U.S. mail.
Source: Bloomberg
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how the decision may impact your operations, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!