Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 18, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOctober is National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, which makes it an excellent time to evaluate your company’s existing prevention and response strategies. A new study regarding the frequency of cyber-attacks should serve as motivation to also evaluate your insurance coverage.

In total, 53 percent of U.S. businesses have fallen victim to a cyber attack in the past year, according to a recent survey by The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co. (HSB). In response to the increased frequency of attacks, nearly two-thirds of companies purchased or increased their level of cyber insurance coverage over the past year. An additional 56 percent of obtained cyber insurance for the first time.
In many cases, the cyber attacks were costly. Of those that experienced cyber attacks, 72 percent spent more than $5,000 to restore or replace software and hardware and address other ramifications of the intrusion. The study further found that 38 percent spent more than $50,000 to investigate the incident and remediate IT vulnerabilities and customer impact: 10 percent spent $100,000 to $250,000, and seven percent, more than $250,000.
When businesses were hacked, the most frequent consequences were data loss (with 60 percent of companies falling victim) and business interruption (55 percent). The most common culprits of the cyber-attacks were malware (53 percent) and viruses (51 percent). The surveyed U.S. businesses also experienced distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks (35 percent), ransomware (29 percent), cyber extortion (25 percent), and social engineering (13 percent). Not surprisingly, businesses listed disgruntled employees (a/k/a malicious insiders) and hackers as the biggest threats to their data security.
While most businesses recognize the threats posed by cyber-attacks and data breaches, studies continually show that many are not devoting the resources needed to adequately address the problem. And that’s understandable – to a point. While businesses must focus on money-generating activities to survive, they must also recognize that the cost of doing business must include adequate cybersecurity measures because a single data breach could easily wreak havoc and interrupt the very business activity necessary to survive – and even destroy the business.
Refreshingly, cybersecurity and IT hygiene need not be complicated or prohibitively costly. In fact, most of the data breach incident response investigations I’ve handled could have been mitigated, if not prevented, had simple measures been taken by the organizations targeted.
With this in mind, below are a few basic, yet valuable, principles for improving your company’s cybersecurity:
As we continually emphasize to our clients, effective data security policies and procedures are essential for businesses of all sizes. Failing to have the proper protections in place will not only hurt your company’s reputation but also may impact your bottom line.
To see how these principles translate into specific actions you can take – today – to be more secure, stay tuned for helpful, daily cybersecurity tips that can help businesses better protect themselves from cyber threats and ensure that trade secrets and personal information are not exposed and compromised.
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo. If you have any questions about this post, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide (http://ewhwblog.com).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!