The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a new initiative targeting cybersecurity-related fraud by government contractors and grant recipients…
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a new initiative targeting cybersecurity-related fraud by government contractors and grant recipients. The Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative will rely on the DOJ’s existing enforcement authority under the False Claims Act (FCA).
“For too long, companies have chosen silence under the mistaken belief that it is less risky to hide a breach than to bring it forward and to report it. Well that changes today,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said in remarks at Aspen Institute’s Cyber Summit. “We are announcing today that we will use our civil enforcement tools to pursue companies, those who are government contractors who receive federal funds, when they fail to follow required cybersecurity standards — because we know that puts all of us at risk. This is a tool that we have to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used appropriately and guard the public fisc and public trust.”
False Claims Act
In broad terms, the FCA imposes liability on any person who knowingly submits a false claim to the government or knowingly makes a false record or statement to get a false claim paid by the government. The FCA also imposes liability when false claims or statements are used to avoid having to pay money to the federal government. The law also contains qui tam provisions, which allow private persons to file suit for violations of the FCA on behalf of the government and to share in any recovery.
Although the FCA has been around since 1863, the government has stepped up enforcement and penalties in recent years. The DOJ’s latest initiative springs from a comprehensive review designed to develop actionable recommendations to enhance and expand the Justice Department’s efforts against cyber threats. According to the agency, it plans to rely on the FCA to pursue cybersecurity-related fraud by government contractors and grant recipients. “We will extract very hefty fines,” Monaco said. “We will protect whistleblowers who bring those violations and those failures forward.”
New Cybersecurity Enforcement
The new initiative will be led by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section, whose goal will be to hold entities accountable when they put federal agency information or systems at risk “by knowingly providing deficient cybersecurity products or services, knowingly misrepresenting their cybersecurity practices or protocols, or knowingly violating obligations to monitor and report cybersecurity incidents and breaches.”
According to the DOJ, the benefits of the initiative will include:
Building broad resiliency against cybersecurity intrusions across the government, the public sector and key industry partners.
Holding contractors and grantees to their commitments to protect government information and infrastructure.
Supporting government experts’ efforts to timely identify, create and publicize patches for vulnerabilities in commonly-used information technology products and services.
Ensuring that companies that follow the rules and invest in meeting cybersecurity requirements are not at a competitive disadvantage.
Reimbursing the government and the taxpayers for the losses incurred when companies fail to satisfy their cybersecurity obligations.
Improving overall cybersecurity practices that will benefit the government, private users and the American public.
Key Takeaway
The DOJ is the latest federal agency to use its existing authority to crack down on companies that fail to adopt adequate cybersecurity standards. To avoid costly liability, we encourage businesses that contract with the federal government to thoroughly review their cybersecurity protocols and breach notification procedures.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Thomas Herndon, Jr., or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
