Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 19, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWith the real possibility of corporate tax reform being thrown about Washington, an old debate has been reopened regarding on whom the corporate income tax really falls.
Those in favor of abolishing the corporate income tax – a stance that has become increasingly popular with some groups – argue that the corporate income tax necessarily falls on people. This is, of course, completely true. Other than money that sits in corporate accounts, which does no one any good, all of the money that passes through a business eventually makes its way to people. Except for the money taken out by taxes, that is.
It is easy to find writers, talk show hosts and politicians who are ready to argue that you, the consumer, are paying a large share of corporate income tax in the form of higher prices on goods. Tim Worstall, regular contributor to Forbes, says it frequently and with significant zeal.
As Bruce Bartlett, who held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, pointed out in a piece for The New York Times, however, virtually all economists roundly reject this idea. The price of goods is set by market forces, not by corporate income taxes. While prices would likely be affected if corporations were the only suppliers of goods and services, they emphatically are not. There are also sole proprietorships, S-corporations, foreign corporations, nonprofits and partnerships. If a corporation were to attempt to compensate for higher corporate taxes by raising its prices, it would be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply.
Left are shareholders and employees. Bartlett cites an article by economist Arnold Harberger, who demonstrated that, at the time, the corporate tax was probably borne entirely by shareholders. There have been arguments that, over time, some of this burden is shifted to employees because the supply of capital shrinks in order to raise the rate of return.
Bartlett examined several analyses included in the March 2013 issue of The National Tax Journal that attempt to determine on whom the tax falls, but found little consensus. Two out of four articles supported the notion that shareholders bear the entire tax. A third suggested that labor bears a full 60 percent of the corporate tax burden, while a fourth found that 82 percent is born by shareholders, leaving workers with 18 percent of the burden.
Understanding where the burden of the corporate income tax falls is essential if we are to make an informed decision regarding tax reform. What appears clear is that the oft-repeated notion that consumers bear this burden is patently false.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!