Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 19, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWith the real possibility of corporate tax reform being thrown about Washington, an old debate has been reopened regarding on whom the corporate income tax really falls.
Those in favor of abolishing the corporate income tax – a stance that has become increasingly popular with some groups – argue that the corporate income tax necessarily falls on people. This is, of course, completely true. Other than money that sits in corporate accounts, which does no one any good, all of the money that passes through a business eventually makes its way to people. Except for the money taken out by taxes, that is.
It is easy to find writers, talk show hosts and politicians who are ready to argue that you, the consumer, are paying a large share of corporate income tax in the form of higher prices on goods. Tim Worstall, regular contributor to Forbes, says it frequently and with significant zeal.
As Bruce Bartlett, who held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, pointed out in a piece for The New York Times, however, virtually all economists roundly reject this idea. The price of goods is set by market forces, not by corporate income taxes. While prices would likely be affected if corporations were the only suppliers of goods and services, they emphatically are not. There are also sole proprietorships, S-corporations, foreign corporations, nonprofits and partnerships. If a corporation were to attempt to compensate for higher corporate taxes by raising its prices, it would be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply.
Left are shareholders and employees. Bartlett cites an article by economist Arnold Harberger, who demonstrated that, at the time, the corporate tax was probably borne entirely by shareholders. There have been arguments that, over time, some of this burden is shifted to employees because the supply of capital shrinks in order to raise the rate of return.
Bartlett examined several analyses included in the March 2013 issue of The National Tax Journal that attempt to determine on whom the tax falls, but found little consensus. Two out of four articles supported the notion that shareholders bear the entire tax. A third suggested that labor bears a full 60 percent of the corporate tax burden, while a fourth found that 82 percent is born by shareholders, leaving workers with 18 percent of the burden.
Understanding where the burden of the corporate income tax falls is essential if we are to make an informed decision regarding tax reform. What appears clear is that the oft-repeated notion that consumers bear this burden is patently false.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher

For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Crypto investor protection continues to evolve, with the SEC and CFTC investing resources and coordinating more closely to uphold regulatory standards. Whether you’re a retail investor, an institutional trader, or part of a crypto startup, understanding enforcement trends is essential for navigating this dynamic and high-stakes regulatory environment. Crypto Is No Longer the Wild West […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!