It can be difficult to get any small business off the ground. For those in the cannabis industry, the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) remains a significant roadblock, as it limits access to banks and other funding sources.
Federal lawmakers are currently considering several measures to help small cannabis businesses take advantage of Small Business Administration (SBA) initiatives. The Republican-controlled Senate Banking Committee also recently held a hearing on the SAFE Banking Act, which would help cannabis businesses of all sizes access banking services.
Access to SBA Initiatives
Recently introduced federal legislation would expressly allow cannabis businesses to take advantage of programs provided by the SBA. The Ensuring Safe Capital Access for All Small Businesses Act of 2019 (H.R. 3540) would make direct or indirect cannabis businesses eligible for SBA-backed loans including: the 7(a) loan guaranty program; disaster assistance; the Microloan program; and the 504 loan program.
“As our society continues to move the needle on this issue, we must recognize that legal cannabis businesses are often small businesses that fuel local economies and create new jobs,” said Chairwoman Velázquez. “That is why I am pleased to introduce legislation to extend affordable lending options to small businesses that operate in the cannabis space, while simultaneously recognizing the structural disadvantages facing entrepreneurs from communities of color.”
Another bill, Ensuring Access to Counseling and Training Programs for All Small Business Act of 2019 (H.R. 3543), would prohibit SBA resource partners from declining to provide services to otherwise eligible small businesses solely because the business is a cannabis-related small business or service provider. Such partners include Small Business Development Centers; Women’s Business Centers; SCORE; and Veterans Business Outreach Centers. Both bills also remove cannabis from the CSA, thereby legalizing it under federal law.
SAFE Banking Act
On July 23, 2019, the Senate Banking Committing held a hearing, entitled “Challenges for Cannabis and Banking: Outside Perspectives,” to assess the lack of banking services for cannabis businesses. The hearing included testimony on the SAFE Banking Act.
Under the legislation, a federal banking regulator may not “prohibit, penalize, or otherwise discourage a depository institution from providing financial services to a cannabis-related legitimate business or to a State or political subdivision of a State that exercises jurisdiction over cannabis-related legitimate businesses.”
The bill further provides that a depository institution that provides financial services to a cannabis-related legitimate business in a state where marijuana has been legalized may not be held liable pursuant to any Federal law or regulation solely for providing such financial services pursuant to the state law or regulation; or for further investing any income derived from such financial services.
Neal Levine, CEO of the Cannabis Trade Federal, said in a statement that he hoped the hearing testimony would bolster the “growing momentum behind meaningful and historic cannabis policy reform.” He added:
This hearing is yet another sign that Congress is taking the cannabis banking problem seriously and intends to take action to correct it. Cannabis businesses operating legally under state and local laws should have the same access to banking and financial services as any other type of business.
While it has been slow to move in the Senate, the SAFE Banking Act has received widespread support at the state level, including the endorsements of many state banking associations, the National Association of State Treasurers, a majority of the country’s state attorneys general, the financial regulators of 25 states, and the governors of 20 states.
The House version of the legislation is also widely supported and now has 206 cosponsors. It has cleared the Financial Services Committee, and a full House vote is expected on the bill in the coming months.
If you have any questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
