
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert A. Marsico
Date: March 13, 2014
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comDespite changing public sentiment and state-level marijuana legalization proposals, cannabis is still illegal under federal law. In fact, the drug is classified as a Schedule 1 Drug, the strictest classification.
Understandably, many businesses are wary of entering the industry. Even common business services, such as banking, credit card processing, leasing, and insurance, can be difficult to obtain when marijuana is involved.
To help alleviate some of the legal uncertainty, the Obama Administration has provided some guidance. Last summer, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a memo stating that prosecutors would not pursue marijuana growers and sellers who comply with local laws, provided that state laws address federal “enforcement priorities” such as preventing interstate smuggling operations, distribution to minors, and “adverse public health consequences.”
Most recently, the Department of the Treasury issued guidance to banks that conduct business with state-licensed marijuana businesses. It clarifies when the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requires financial institutions to file “suspicious activity reports” (SARs). In order to align “the information provided by financial institutions in BSA reports with federal and state law enforcement priorities,” the memo distinguishes between the SARS reporting required for businesses that operate legally under state law and those that do not.
The Treasury memo also offers guidance for assessing the risk of providing services to a marijuana-related business, noting that banks should conduct customer due diligence that includes:
Because the guidance leaves a lot of grey areas and offers no guarantees, many banks in states like Colorado are calling for more definitive regulations. They point to the Marijuana Businesses Access to Banking Act, which was introduced last summer by Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.) and Denny Heck (D-Wash.). The federal legislation would provide safe harbor for banks that deal with state-legal marijuana businesses and protect them from both criminal prosecution and administrative penalties, including loss of federal deposit insurance.
If you have any questions about the business risks associated with the marijuana industry or would like to discuss the options for your business, please contact me, Robert Marisco, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!