
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert A. Marsico
Date: March 13, 2014

Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comDespite changing public sentiment and state-level marijuana legalization proposals, cannabis is still illegal under federal law. In fact, the drug is classified as a Schedule 1 Drug, the strictest classification.

Understandably, many businesses are wary of entering the industry. Even common business services, such as banking, credit card processing, leasing, and insurance, can be difficult to obtain when marijuana is involved.
To help alleviate some of the legal uncertainty, the Obama Administration has provided some guidance. Last summer, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a memo stating that prosecutors would not pursue marijuana growers and sellers who comply with local laws, provided that state laws address federal “enforcement priorities” such as preventing interstate smuggling operations, distribution to minors, and “adverse public health consequences.”
Most recently, the Department of the Treasury issued guidance to banks that conduct business with state-licensed marijuana businesses. It clarifies when the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requires financial institutions to file “suspicious activity reports” (SARs). In order to align “the information provided by financial institutions in BSA reports with federal and state law enforcement priorities,” the memo distinguishes between the SARS reporting required for businesses that operate legally under state law and those that do not.
The Treasury memo also offers guidance for assessing the risk of providing services to a marijuana-related business, noting that banks should conduct customer due diligence that includes:
Because the guidance leaves a lot of grey areas and offers no guarantees, many banks in states like Colorado are calling for more definitive regulations. They point to the Marijuana Businesses Access to Banking Act, which was introduced last summer by Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.) and Denny Heck (D-Wash.). The federal legislation would provide safe harbor for banks that deal with state-legal marijuana businesses and protect them from both criminal prosecution and administrative penalties, including loss of federal deposit insurance.
If you have any questions about the business risks associated with the marijuana industry or would like to discuss the options for your business, please contact me, Robert Marisco, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!