Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 2, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe perfect storm of COVID-19 and the flu is expected to descend on New York and New Jersey this fall. Employers understandably want to take all reasonable precautions to keep their workers safe. But can they require employers to get vaccinations?

To date, federal and state agencies have not issued guidance regarding future COVID-19 vaccination. However, agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have addressed the annual flu vaccine. State also have statutes that dictate who must receive an annual flu shot.
Eighteen states have enacted flu vaccination requirements for hospital healthcare workers, and 16 states establish requirements for hospital patients. New Jersey only mandates flu shots for small children. It does not require workers, even those in the healthcare industry, to get vaccinated against influenza.
The New York State Department of Health requires that all workers of healthcare and residential facilities who could potentially expose patients or residents to influenza either receive seasonal influenza vaccinations or wear a surgical mask during the period when influenza is prevalent in New York State (as determined by the state’s Commissioner of Health). New York also mandates flu shots for young children who attend daycare, Head Start, pre-K or nursery school.
In the absence of regulations, employers are free to establish their own workplace vaccination policies. However, to avoid facing legal liability, mandatory flu vaccination policies must provide for exceptions, as well as outline the steps that workers must take to rely on them.
For instance, an employee may be entitled to an exemption from a mandatory vaccination requirement based on a medical condition that prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), employers must provide a reasonable accommodation barring undue hardship, i.e. significant difficulty or expense. Similarly, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, once an employer receives notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation unless it would pose more than a de minimis hardship.
Employers that do not want to require vaccination can still strongly recommend that employees get a flu shot. To bolster these efforts and facilitate the process, employers can run a free flu shot clinic on site, offer “prizes” for workers who elect to get vaccinated, and allow workers to take paid time off to get vaccinated.
Given that COVID-19 can lead to lengthy employee absences and even force business closures, the benefits of a safe and effective coronavirus vaccine will be significant. Once inoculated, workers likely will hopefully be able to fully return to the office, interact with customers, and travel freely. Nonetheless, employers should carefully review any regulatory guidance that may be available before establishing a policy regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Much like the flu shot, employers will likely be required to allow employees to opt out of COVID-19 vaccination if they have medical or religious objections. At the same time, employers will also be likely to bolster vaccination by offering free vaccination at the workplace, much like flu shots.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!