The Trump Administration Recently Announced a New Policy That Aims to Deregulate the Commercial Space Industry
President Donald Trump’s initiatives to remove regulatory roadblocks go all the way to the final frontier. The Trump Administration recently announced a new policy that aims to deregulate the commercial space industry.
The global space economy is closing in on $350 billion and is expected to become a multitrillion-dollar industry. It’s not all about traveling to Mars or creating a moon colony, commercial space opportunities include space tourism, mining, and satellite communications.
In 2010, President Barack Obama announced a new national space policy, which focused on encouraging and facilitating the growth of a U.S. commercial space sector. However, as countries across the globe strive to win the latest “space race,” the privately funded U.S. space industry maintains that it is still being hampered by federal regulations that have failed to evolve with technology.
Further assistance may be forthcoming. Since taking office President Trump has signaled that the U.S. space industry is a priority. Last June, President Trump signed an Executive Order reconvening the National Space Council for the first time in 24 years. On December 11, 2017, he signed Space Policy Directive-1, which directed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to return American astronauts to the Moon with the ultimate goal of establishing human missions to Mars.
Space Policy Directive 2
On May 24, 2018, President Trump signed Space Policy Directive-2 (SPD-2), which reflects recommendations made to the President by the National Space Council. Among other mandates, SPD-2 directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish a new regulatory system for managing launch and re-entry activity. The new rules must specifically “consider requiring a single license for all types of commercial space flight launch and re-entry operations and replacing prescriptive requirements in the process with performance-based criteria.”
Space Policy Directive 2 directs Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Jr. to “transmit a plan to create a ‘one-stop shop’ within the Department of Commerce for administering and regulating commercial space flight activities.” In a recent op-ed in the New York Times, Ross highlighted the benefits of consolidating federal oversight.
“At my department alone, there are six bureaus involved in the space industry. A unified departmental office for business needs will enable better coordination of space-related activities,” Ross wrote. “When companies seek guidance on launching satellites, the Space Administration will be able to address an array of space activities, including remote sensing, economic development, data-purchase policies, GPS, spectrum policy, trade promotion, standards and technology and space-traffic management.”
Under SPD-2, federal agencies are also directed to submit a report to President Trump on “improving global competitiveness of United States space radio frequency spectrum policies, regulation, and activities at the International Telecommunication Union and other multilateral forums.” In addition, the Directive requires the National Space Council to review export licensing regulations affecting commercial space flight activity and deliver recommendations to the President within 180 days.
What’s Next?
The Trump Administration’s latest policy directive is a step in the right direction. However, more must be done for the U.S. commercial space industry to reach its full potential, including additional measures to modernize and streamline federal regulations. For many of these reforms, Congress must also get involved.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jason A. LaBerteaux, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
