
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 12, 2015
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThere are approximately 50 spinoffs each year in the United States. Expedia made headlines several years ago with its spinoff of Trip Advisor. Currently, the business world is buzzing over when and if EBay, Inc. will spinoff its extremely successful PayPal unit. In a traditional spinoff, a corporation distributes 100 percent of its ownership interest in an existing division or business unit as a stock dividend to existing shareholders. Alternatively, shares can also be sold to the public via an initial public offering (IPO) transaction known as a “carve out.” In either case, the end result is a new and distinct corporate entity.
Likely candidates include unrelated or underperforming units that may perform better on their own, while also allowing the parent company to focus on its core products or new offerings.
As with any corporate divestiture, there are both benefits and disadvantages. Spinoffs are beneficial because they result in so-called “pure play” companies that are attractive to investors because of their narrow focus on one particular industry segment or business strategy. Spinoffs also allow each company to pursue individual capital structures, operation plans, and growth strategies that are tailored to its business needs. They also do not generate tax liability, while proceeds from a sale are subject to capital gains taxes.
Of course, there are downsides. While share prices generally stabilize or even perform better, both the parent and the spinoff are likely to experience volatility in the short term. In addition, spinoffs can be extremely long and complex transactions, particularly in cases where the unit to be spun off is deeply interconnected with the parent company. As with any potential divestiture, careful planning and consultation with a team of experienced professionals is key to success.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!