Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

NYSE Proposing to Let Firms Raise Capital Via Direct Listing

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: January 30, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) wants to allow companies in a direct listing to raise capital

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) wants to allow companies in a direct listing to raise capital. However, it’s unclear if the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will sign off on the proposal.

NYSE Proposing to Let Companies Raise Capital Via Direct Listing

Direct Listings vs IPO

Direct listings have become a hot topic after music-streaming company Spotify Technology SA used the process to go public last year. In 2019, tech company, Slack Technologies Inc., followed suit. In 2020, Airbnb and Asana are also expected to go public via direct listings.

Direct listings and IPOs both allow a private company to “go public” and begin selling its shares of stock on the open market. In a direct listing, also known as a direct public offering (DPO), companies sell their shares directly to the public. Direct listings are attractive because they avoid a lot of the complex and expensive processes that are required in an IPO. In an IPO, underwriters facilitate the process and charge a commission for their work. In a DPO, the business may save money by avoiding the costs associated with underwriters. However, because companies do not partner with an investment bank or broker-dealer, they must do a lot of the legwork in-house, which can be burdensome.

DPOs can also be risky. Unlike an IPO, the number of shares offered and initial price are not predetermined. On the day of the DPO, the stock is available for trading; however, the number of shares available is determined by the number of employees and initial investors who choose to list on the market. In addition, pricing is determined by market conditions and demand rather than an underwriter.

NYSE Direct Listing Proposal

Currently, direct listings on the NYSE are limited to those shares owned by existing stockholders. To expand access to direct listings, the NYSE is seeking to amend its Listed Company Manual (the “Manual”) to modify the provisions relating to direct listings.

The NYSE’s proposed changes would allow a company to sell shares on its own behalf through a direct listing in the opening auction on the first day of trading on the NYSE. The proposal would permit a company to conduct the new “Primary Direct Floor Listing” in addition to, or instead of, a traditional Selling Shareholder Direct Floor Listing.

Under current NYSE rules, a company seeking to pursue a secondary direct listing must “demonstrate that it has $250 million in market value of publicly-held shares at the time of listing.” For Primary Direct Floor Listings, the NYSE proposes that a company would qualify for listing by selling at least $250 million in market value of shares in the opening auction. The NYSE further proposes that a company would qualify for listing in connection with a Primary Direct Floor Listing if the aggregate of the market value of publicly-held shares immediately prior to listing together with the market value of shares sold by the company in the opening auction totals at least $250 million.

The NYSE proposal also amends the distribution requirements for both primary and secondary direct listings. Currently, a company must have at least 400 round lot holders and 1.1 million publicly held shares at the time of listing, which can be a challenge for a private company pursuing a direct listing. 

The NYSE proposes to amend Section 102.01A to provide that any company listing in connection with a Primary Direct Floor Listing in which the company sells at least $250 million in market value of shares in the opening auction on the initial listing date may list and commence trading on the basis that the company would have to demonstrate compliance with the distribution requirements within 90 trading days of the listing date.

The NYSE further proposes to provide the benefit of the same distribution period in the case of: (i) a company listing in connection with a Selling Shareholder Direct Floor Listing that demonstrates $350 million in market value of publicly-held shares; and (ii) a Primary Direct Floor Listing in which the company sells less than $250 million of its stock in the opening auction but has a market value of publicly-held shares immediately prior to listing together with the market value of shares sold by the company in the opening auction totaling at least $350 million.

SEC Rejects Initial Proposal

On December 6, 2019, the SEC rejected the NYSE’s initial proposal. In response, the NYSE stated that it would continue to work with the SEC. “We are committed to the evolution of the direct listing. Our rule changes, if approved, will make these transactions available to a broader universe of companies and create the option for a capital raise as part of a direct listing,” John Tuttle, Vice Chairman and Chief Commercial Officer at NYSE, said in a statement.

It is not uncommon for the SEC to reject an initial proposal and then go on to approve a rule change, provided that the NYSE addresses any concerns raised by the SEC staff. The NYSE has already amended its proposal. In its latest filing, the NYSE lowered the minimum amount companies would need to sell in a Primary Direct Floor Listing from $250 million to $100.

Key Takeaway

The availability of primary direct listings may encourage more companies to consider going public. We will continue to track the NYSE’s direct listing proposal. In addition, NASDAQ is reportedly considering its own rule changes, which are expected in 2020.

While direct listings may be attracting a lot of buzz, they are not the best option for every company. To determine the best path for your business, it is always wise to consult with an experienced business attorney. At Scarinci Hollenbeck, we can help you weigh the risks and benefits of an IPO, a DPO, or other capital-raising alternatives.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan post image

When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan"
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips post image

Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips"
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation post image

Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation"
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce post image

How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce"
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes post image

10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes"
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together post image

Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!