Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 19, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Legislature is currently debating whether self-driving vehicles should be allowed on state roadways and, if so, what types of safeguards should be in place. While many other states have given autonomous vehicles the green light, New Jersey does not yet have any regulations in place.

The primary benefit touted by makers of autonomous vehicles is that they should ultimately result in greater roadway safety. There are 5.5 million traffic collisions in the United States every year, of which 81 percent are attributable to human error. Given the statistics, some proponents predict that crashes could decrease by as much as 90 percent.
Driverless cars are also big business. The global autonomous vehicle industry is expected to grow more than tenfold from 2019 to 2026, according to the latest market research. Allied Market Research predicts that the global market for self-driving vehicles will be worth $54.23 billion in 2019 and increase to $556.67 billion by 2026, with a compound annual growth rate of 39.47 percent during that time frame.
With the industry poised to take off, companies from General Motors to Google’s Waymo are seeking to capitalize on self-driving technology. In addition to automakers, the industry offers opportunities for companies providing ride-hailing freight transportation, and food delivery services (to name just a few).
Of course, self-driving cars may not be good news for all businesses. If autonomous vehicles do become the norm, they could have a significant impact on the traditional business models employed in a number of industries, including car manufacturing, transportation, and auto insurance. Like all new technology, businesses and consumers will adapt, and there are winners and losers in that process.
Some states have implemented regulations to address driverless cars, which are already on the road for testing. In California, operators of autonomous vehicles must undergo special training and be capable of taking over control in the case of an emergency. Manufacturers must report any type of accident or any situation where the autonomous technology disengages during operation to the state’s Department of Motor vehicles within 10 days. They must also maintain $5 million insurance or surety bond.
In New Jersey, lawmakers are currently whether to allow driverless cars to be tested on public roadways. On October 22, 2018, the Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology and the Transportation and Independent Authorities committees held a joint hearing to consider testimony from a wide range of experts. Below are several bills currently under consideration:
In addition to overcoming the regulatory hurdles, the autonomous vehicle industry must also convince consumers self-driving cars are safe. Consumers have yet to buy in on self-driving technology, particularly in light of several well-publicized crashes that resulted in fatalities. A recent study by the AAA revealed that 73 percent of survey respondents reported being too afraid to ride in a fully self-driving vehicle, compared to 63 percent in 2017. In addition, 63 percent of the U.S adults surveyed said “they would actually feel less safe sharing the road with a self-driving vehicle while walking or riding a bicycle.”
Importantly, for businesses and investors interested in autonomous vehicle technology and the resulting industry disruption, there is a wealth of opportunity potential and the question is whether New Jersey will get in on that action. Of course, legal uncertainties abound, as with any disruptive technology. At Scarinci Hollenbeck, our Business and Technology Law practice groups will be closely monitoring the technological and legal developments.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jeffrey K. Cassin, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!