The House of Reps Passed the 1st Federal Bill to Address Autonomous Vehicle Tech
The House of Representatives recently passed the first federal bill to address autonomous vehicle technology. The bipartisan Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research in Vehicle Evolution Act (SELF DRIVE Act) now heads to the U.S. Senate.
Self-driving vehicles are likely the destined for a road near you. Everyone from Uber to traditional auto manufacturers is working on autonomous vehicle technology. Overall, the driverless vehicles will power $7 trillion worth of economic activity and new efficiencies annually by 2050, according to a recent study by Intel and the research firm Strategy Analytics. The explosive growth of the industry is expected to involve nearly $4 trillion from driverless ride-hailing and nearly $3 trillion from driverless delivery and business logistics.
While autonomous vehicle technology can improve efficiency, the primary benefit of is safety. In 2016, there were an estimated 40,000 U.S. traffic fatalities, 2.5 million injuries, and over 6 million car accidents. Given that an astounding 94 percent of accidents are attributable to human error, experts predict that crashes could decrease by as much as 90 percent if drivers are taken out of the equation.
As beneficial as autonomous vehicles may be, they still face significant hurdles. First, regulators must get on board by allowing the self-driving cars on the road. Second, manufacturers must convince consumers that they are safe.
Provisions of SELF DRIVE Act
For businesses in the autonomous vehicle industry, the SELF DRIVE Act is a positive development. To start, the bill clearly defines state and federal oversight over automated driving systems. The SELF DRIVE Act provides that states will continue to control vehicle registration, licensing, driving education and training, insurance, law enforcement, crash investigations, safety and emissions inspections, congestion management of vehicles on their streets, and traffic laws and regulations. Meanwhile, the National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) would oversee the safety of the design, construction, and performance of self-driving cars to avoid requirements that would prohibit or limit interstate commerce and travel.
The federal legislation would also exempt automakers and tech companies from the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards that apply to traditional vehicles, with the goal of
accelerating the deployment and testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads. Each manufacturer would be entitled to exemptions for up to 100,000 vehicles each year for three years. After the third year, the available exceptions would gradually increase. Going forward, NHTSA would also be tasked with creating new rules and standards that address highly automated vehicles.
While the bill does not establish specific cybersecurity standards, it would require manufacturers to notify consumers regarding its practices to gather and use data collected from vehicle owners or occupants.
NHTSA Announces Revised Automated Driving Policy
In a separate action, NHTSA announced a revised federal policy for automated vehicles. The guidance, entitled “Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety,” does not impose any new compliance obligations, but rather aims to “support the industry as it develops best practices in the design, development, testing, and deployment of automated vehicle technologies.”
The updated guidance reflects many of the same policies outlined under the Obama Administration in 2016. One key difference is that entities will not have to undergo a pre-market approval process before launching new autonomous vehicle technology. In addition, the agency does not plan to impose any new reporting obligations at this time.
As highlighted above, the self-driving vehicle industry is continually growing and evolving. To date, regulations have failed to keep pace. To avoid a patchwork of state laws, businesses need a comprehensive roadmap to follow that will not hamper innovation.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Robert Levy, at 201-806-3364.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
