The House of Reps Passed the 1st Federal Bill to Address Autonomous Vehicle Tech
The House of Representatives recently passed the first federal bill to address autonomous vehicle technology. The bipartisan Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research in Vehicle Evolution Act (SELF DRIVE Act) now heads to the U.S. Senate.
Self-driving vehicles are likely the destined for a road near you. Everyone from Uber to traditional auto manufacturers is working on autonomous vehicle technology. Overall, the driverless vehicles will power $7 trillion worth of economic activity and new efficiencies annually by 2050, according to a recent study by Intel and the research firm Strategy Analytics. The explosive growth of the industry is expected to involve nearly $4 trillion from driverless ride-hailing and nearly $3 trillion from driverless delivery and business logistics.
While autonomous vehicle technology can improve efficiency, the primary benefit of is safety. In 2016, there were an estimated 40,000 U.S. traffic fatalities, 2.5 million injuries, and over 6 million car accidents. Given that an astounding 94 percent of accidents are attributable to human error, experts predict that crashes could decrease by as much as 90 percent if drivers are taken out of the equation.
As beneficial as autonomous vehicles may be, they still face significant hurdles. First, regulators must get on board by allowing the self-driving cars on the road. Second, manufacturers must convince consumers that they are safe.
Provisions of SELF DRIVE Act
For businesses in the autonomous vehicle industry, the SELF DRIVE Act is a positive development. To start, the bill clearly defines state and federal oversight over automated driving systems. The SELF DRIVE Act provides that states will continue to control vehicle registration, licensing, driving education and training, insurance, law enforcement, crash investigations, safety and emissions inspections, congestion management of vehicles on their streets, and traffic laws and regulations. Meanwhile, the National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) would oversee the safety of the design, construction, and performance of self-driving cars to avoid requirements that would prohibit or limit interstate commerce and travel.
The federal legislation would also exempt automakers and tech companies from the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards that apply to traditional vehicles, with the goal of
accelerating the deployment and testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads. Each manufacturer would be entitled to exemptions for up to 100,000 vehicles each year for three years. After the third year, the available exceptions would gradually increase. Going forward, NHTSA would also be tasked with creating new rules and standards that address highly automated vehicles.
While the bill does not establish specific cybersecurity standards, it would require manufacturers to notify consumers regarding its practices to gather and use data collected from vehicle owners or occupants.
NHTSA Announces Revised Automated Driving Policy
In a separate action, NHTSA announced a revised federal policy for automated vehicles. The guidance, entitled “Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety,” does not impose any new compliance obligations, but rather aims to “support the industry as it develops best practices in the design, development, testing, and deployment of automated vehicle technologies.”
The updated guidance reflects many of the same policies outlined under the Obama Administration in 2016. One key difference is that entities will not have to undergo a pre-market approval process before launching new autonomous vehicle technology. In addition, the agency does not plan to impose any new reporting obligations at this time.
As highlighted above, the self-driving vehicle industry is continually growing and evolving. To date, regulations have failed to keep pace. To avoid a patchwork of state laws, businesses need a comprehensive roadmap to follow that will not hamper innovation.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Robert Levy, at 201-806-3364.
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
