Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Is Federal Autonomous Vehicle Legislation on the Fast Track?

Author: Robert E. Levy

Date: October 9, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

The House of Reps Passed the 1st Federal Bill to Address Autonomous Vehicle Tech

The House of Representatives recently passed the first federal bill to address autonomous vehicle technology. The bipartisan Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research in Vehicle Evolution Act (SELF DRIVE Act) now heads to the U.S. Senate.

Is Federal Autonomous Vehicle Legislation on the Fast Track?
Photo courtesy of Sanjeevan SatheesKumar (Unsplash.com)

 Autonomous Vehicle Technology

Self-driving vehicles are likely the destined for a road near you. Everyone from Uber to traditional auto manufacturers is working on autonomous vehicle technology. Overall, the driverless vehicles will power $7 trillion worth of economic activity and new efficiencies annually by 2050, according to a recent study by Intel and the research firm Strategy Analytics. The explosive growth of the industry is expected to involve nearly $4 trillion from driverless ride-hailing and nearly $3 trillion from driverless delivery and business logistics.

While autonomous vehicle technology can improve efficiency, the primary benefit of is safety. In 2016, there were an estimated 40,000 U.S. traffic fatalities, 2.5 million injuries, and over 6 million car accidents. Given that an astounding 94 percent of accidents are attributable to human error, experts predict that crashes could decrease by as much as 90 percent if drivers are taken out of the equation.

As beneficial as autonomous vehicles may be, they still face significant hurdles. First, regulators must get on board by allowing the self-driving cars on the road. Second, manufacturers must convince consumers that they are safe.

Provisions of SELF DRIVE Act 

For businesses in the autonomous vehicle industry, the SELF DRIVE Act is a positive development. To start, the bill clearly defines state and federal oversight over automated driving systems. The SELF DRIVE Act provides that states will continue to control vehicle registration, licensing, driving education and training, insurance, law enforcement, crash investigations, safety and emissions inspections, congestion management of vehicles on their streets, and traffic laws and regulations. Meanwhile, the National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) would oversee the safety of the design, construction, and performance of self-driving cars to avoid requirements that would prohibit or limit interstate commerce and travel.

The federal legislation would also exempt automakers and tech companies from the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards that apply to traditional vehicles, with the goal of

accelerating the deployment and testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads. Each manufacturer would be entitled to exemptions for up to 100,000 vehicles each year for three years. After the third year, the available exceptions would gradually increase. Going forward, NHTSA would also be tasked with creating new rules and standards that address highly automated vehicles.

While the bill does not establish specific cybersecurity standards, it would require manufacturers to notify consumers regarding its practices to gather and use data collected from vehicle owners or occupants.

NHTSA Announces Revised Automated Driving Policy

In a separate action, NHTSA announced a revised federal policy for automated vehicles. The guidance, entitled “Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety,” does not impose any new compliance obligations, but rather aims to “support the industry as it develops best practices in the design, development, testing, and deployment of automated vehicle technologies.”

The updated guidance reflects many of the same policies outlined under the Obama Administration in 2016. One key difference is that entities will not have to undergo a pre-market approval process before launching new autonomous vehicle technology. In addition, the agency does not plan to impose any new reporting obligations at this time.

As highlighted above, the self-driving vehicle industry is continually growing and evolving. To date, regulations have failed to keep pace. To avoid a patchwork of state laws, businesses need a comprehensive roadmap to follow that will not hamper innovation.

Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Robert Levy, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!