A hedge fund operator accused of securities fraud was recently sentenced to three months in prison for obstruction of justice…
A hedge fund operator accused of securities fraud was recently sentenced to three months in prison for obstruction of justice. The charges stemmed from lying to investigators during a deposition conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Niket Jain, a managing member of an investment company, Aberon Capital Management, was charged with conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, securities fraud, wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. Prosecutors alleged that Jain provided false representations to two investors in a fund controlled by Aberon regarding the fund’s performance.
Late last year, Jain pled guilty to one count of obstruction of justice pursuant to a plea agreement with federal prosecutors. However, New York District Judge P. Kevin Castel declined to follow the recommendation of the U.S. probation office and sentence Jain to time served. Instead, he sentenced Jain to three months in prison, along with a fine of $15,000 and one year of supervised release. Judge Castel seemingly agreed with prosecutors who argued it was important to “send a message to people in the financial industry” that the only way financial professionals can fulfill their obligations to regulators “is for witnesses to tell the truth.” According to Judge Castel, “It becomes in this case important to deliver the message that the crime is deserving of meaningful punishment.”
When an SEC Investigation Can Lead to Jail Time
The Jain case provides valuable lessons for firms and individuals under the SEC’s purview. Of the utmost importance, lying to investigators is the quickest way for the situation to go from bad to worse.
When the SEC launches an investigation, it first develops the facts to the fullest extent possible through informal inquiry, interviewing witnesses, examining brokerage records, reviewing trading data, and other methods. Once armed with a formal order of investigation, the staff of the SEC’s Enforcement Division can compel witnesses by subpoena to testify and produce books, records, and other relevant documents.
Being the target of a SEC investigation can be extremely stressful, even if you’re fairly confident that you haven’t done anything wrong. To avoid unintended criminal liability, it is imperative to be truthful and cooperate with investigators. Of course, that doesn’t mean that you should not aggressively seek to protect your legal rights.
In the case above, the defendant ultimately faced criminal liability not for securities fraud, but lying to investigators. When confronted with a SEC investigation (or even an examination), there are steps you can take to help ensure a more favorable outcome:
Resist temptation: Firms may be tempted to be less than forthcoming, particularly if they suspect that SEC investigators may find something they don’t like. However, this will only lead to greater problems. Do not destroy your documents and don’t delete your emails.
Involve legal counsel: Make sure your attorneys have experience and expertise in dealing with government investigations specifically by this agency.
Document the process: Firms should keep track of all documents provided to the SEC using a list or spreadsheet.
Monitor interaction: It is imperative to make sure that anyone speaking with the SEC is open and honest with the information that they provide. To stay on top of the situation, it is often a good idea to de-brief employees who speak with examiners.
Following an investigation, SEC staff present their findings to the Commission for its review. The Commission can authorize the staff to file a case in federal court or bring an administrative action. Enforcement can also refer potential criminal cases to criminal law enforcement authorities for investigation or coordinate SEC investigations with criminal investigations involving the same conduct. While the SEC can‘t by itself impose criminal sanctions, if a person is convicted of a criminal violation of the securities laws, a court may sentence that person to serve time in jail.
In some cases, the targets of an SEC investigation can reach a settlement with SEC enforcement officials or a plea agreement with federal prosecutors. While this will be greatly influenced by the facts of the case, how targets of an investigation (or a witness) conduct themselves during the investigation can often play a role in the result of the matter.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further, please contact Dan Brecher or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
