Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 6, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of new technology by individuals, businesses, and government agencies. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) authorized a recent rule change allowing electronic signatures to be used when executing authentication documents in connection with many documents filed with the Commission.
According to the SEC, the amendments recognize the “widespread use of electronic signatures and technological developments in the authentication and security of electronic signatures, as well as the continuing need to support remote workforces.” Nearly 100 public companies had also called for changes to the SEC’s signature requirements in an April 2020 rulemaking petition. The rulemaking petition stated, among other things, that “the current COVID-19 situation has … significantly increased the difficulties associated with obtaining manual ‘wet’ signatures.” It added that “[i]mprovements in electronic signature software technology make it possible to confirm (with at least equal confidence to the collection of manual signatures) who has signed a document and when it was signed.”
Regulation S-T, as well as the EDGAR Filer Manual, govern the electronic submission of documents filed with, or otherwise submitted to, the SEC through EDGAR. Title 17, section 232.302(b) (Rule 302(b)) currently requires that each signatory to an electronic filing manually sign a signature page or other document (referred to as an “authentication document”) before or at the time of the electronic filing to authenticate, acknowledge, or otherwise adopt the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic filing. An electronic filer must retain the authentication document with respect to each signatory to the electronic filing for a period of five years and must furnish a copy of it to the Commission or its staff upon request.
On November 17, 2020, the SEC approved amendments to Rule 302(b) that will permit a signatory to an electronic filing who complies with procedures to sign an authentication document through an electronic signature that meets requirements specified in the EDGAR Filer Manual. The SEC also amended rules and forms under the Securities Act, Exchange Act, and Investment Company Act to allow the use of electronic signatures in authentication documents in connection with certain other filings when these filings contain typed, rather than manual, signatures.
The amended EDGAR Filer Manual requires that, when a signatory signs an authentication document using an electronic signature, the signing process for the electronic signature must, at a minimum:
New Rule 302(b)(2) also requires that, prior to initial use of an electronic signature to sign an authentication document, the signatory must manually sign a document attesting that the signatory agrees that the use of an electronic signature in any authentication document constitutes the legal equivalent of such individual’s manual signature for purposes of authenticating the signature to any filing for which it is provided. An electronic filer must retain this manually signed document for as long as the signatory may use an electronic signature to sign an authentication document and for a minimum period of seven years after the date of the most recent electronically signed authentication document.
Current requirements of Rule 302(b) are otherwise unchanged, including the requirements that an electronic filer retain the authentication document for a period of five years and furnish a copy of it upon request to the Commission or its staff.
The SEC amendments will make it easier for businesses to obtain electronic signatures when filing a wide range of documents with the agency, including registration statements, current and periodic reports, and beneficial ownership reports.
Although the rule amendments will be effective upon publication of the adopting release in the Federal Register, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance, the Division of Investment Management, and the Division of Trading and Markets announced that they will not recommend the Commission take enforcement action with respect to the requirements of Rule 302(b) in advance of such time provided that a signatory complies with all of the requirements of amended Rule 302(b).
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Paul A. Lieberman or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!